Teams

OSTC - Martin

2026 Adult 55 & Over-GC · Men 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-13vs Bowman - BiloxiLost 12
L#1 DoublesDuane Mcpeek / Dean Doty vs Colin Jones / Kazunobu Kawada2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Wilson / Bill Descher vs Joseph Gregory / Sheldon Zhang6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesStephen Cawthon / Doug Nash vs Ernest Anderson / Stephen Coleman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-29vs Bowman - BiloxiLost 03
L#1 DoublesDuane Mcpeek / Kevin Martin vs Kelly Lee / Jack Robinson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBill Descher / Dean Doty vs Bruce Clopton / Sheldon Zhang7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCultus Pearson / Reuben Byrd vs Tammy Bowman / Stephen Coleman3-6, 3-6
2026-03-09vs Bowman - BiloxiWon 21
W#1 DoublesDuane Mcpeek / Charles Wilson vs Sheldon Zhang / Ernest Anderson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBill Descher / Dean Doty vs Tammy Bowman / Michael Thompson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWilliam Mitchell / Stephen Cawthon vs Jack Robinson / Henry P Calamari3-6, 3-6
2026-03-02vs Bowman - BiloxiLost 02
L#1 DoublesDuane Mcpeek / Stephen Cawthon vs Ernest Anderson / Jack Robinson6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Martin / Cultus Pearson vs Tammy Bowman / Henry P Calamari3-6, 2-6
2026-03-01vs Bowman - BiloxiLost 02
L#1 DoublesDoug Nash / Charles Wilson vs Kelly Lee / Bruce Clopton4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesReuben Byrd / Cultus Pearson vs Colin Jones / Kazunobu Kawada1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bowman - Biloxi4112310111
2OSTC - Martin1431226159

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Bill Descher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Duane Mcpeek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Doug Nash
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Dean Doty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Stephen Cawthon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Cultus Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.13
Reuben Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cultus Pearson + Reuben Byrd044 matchesnot enough data
Reuben Byrd + Duane Mcpeek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Descher
9W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Duane Mcpeek
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Doug Nash
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Dean Doty
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Stephen Cawthon
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
4
Cultus Pearson
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
Reuben Byrd
30W–64L career · 8 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.