Teams

Patten/Wasta

2026 IA 18 & Over Adult Mixed League · 7.0 X'd 18 Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-01-04vs SteckelLost 12
L#1 DoublesCait Klenk / Philip Wasta vs Sarah Hinkhouse / Jon Hinkhouse3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCaren Wasta / Samuel Patten vs Kelly Drake / Mark Steckel6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCheryl Patten / Daryl Patten vs Patricia Conrad / Ray Krauss7-5, 6-4
2025-12-07vs RossLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Patten / Samuel Patten vs Carolyn Conlon / Jake Flanders4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCait Klenk / Philip Wasta vs Tracey Kramer / Thomas Ross6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Corbett / Daryl Patten vs Rolando Sanchez / Elisha Horsfall4-6, 4-6
2025-11-09vs BrownLost 03
L#1 DoublesSamuel Patten / Cait Klenk vs Tim Carstensen / Suzi Carstensen6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Thinnes / Daryl Patten vs Greg Ervin / Holly Ervin4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Corbett / Peter Eddington vs Ann Brown / Muhannad Abu Nameh4-6, 3-6
2025-10-24vs IA/Rath/18&Over7.0XLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilip Wasta / Caren Wasta vs Charles Errington / Jennifer Kemmerer0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Patten / Peter Eddington vs JENNIFER HEBERT / Dominick Rath0-6, 3-6
2025-09-26vs GarnerLost 03
L#1 DoublesSamuel Patten / Cait Klenk vs Rochelle Davis / Douglas Allemang2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaryl Patten / Cheryl Patten vs Maleah Hampton / Steven Odegaard1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Corbett / Peter Eddington vs Amara Andrews / Paul Trovas0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 X'd 18 Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Rath/18&Over7.0X50123883
2Kakade/Keshwani1551328200
3Patten/Wasta0511428176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Cait Klenk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Philip Wasta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Cheryl Patten
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Thinnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Carrie Corbett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Caren Wasta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Samuel Patten
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.92
Daryl Patten
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Peter Eddington
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Patten + Daryl Patten123 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Patten + Samuel Patten033 matchesnot enough data
Cait Klenk + Samuel Patten033 matchesnot enough data
Peter Eddington + Carrie Corbett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cait Klenk
17W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Philip Wasta
16W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Cheryl Patten
29W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Karen Thinnes
31W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Carrie Corbett
23W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.98
3.5
Caren Wasta
37W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Samuel Patten
9W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Daryl Patten
8W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Peter Eddington
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.