Teams

SFV LLW - Mixed Emotions - Grace Gillham

2023 Mixed 40+ SFV Spring · SFV 40 & Over - 6.0 MxD

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-01vs SFV - Nikki's Tennis CrewWon 20
W#2 DoublesDan Lula / Aline MacK vs Jake Kasarjian / Tracy Bodis6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesScott Carrithers / Juli Dershewitz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-11vs SFV - Paseo Rico SuaveLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Ball / John Hernandez vs TANIA JANICEK / Patrick Tamondong2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesScott Carrithers / Aline MacK vs CHERYL KEEHNE / Jordan Ulch6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-03vs SFV - Nikki's Tennis CrewLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Carrithers / Aline MacK vs Paul Ketrick / JESSICA Enriquez2-6, 5-7
2023-05-27vs SFV - Paseo RanchersWon 10
W#2 DoublesAline MacK / Scott Carrithers vs Cherie Lakin / Juan Tabanera6-2, 6-4
2023-05-13vs SFV - Mix & MatchLost 01
L#2 DoublesJuli Dershewitz / Dan Lula vs Holly Culhane / Ola Heum0-6, 2-6
2023-05-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesAline MacK / Scott Carrithers vs Lauren Soll / Zaven Atashian6-2, 6-1
2023-04-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesJuli Dershewitz / Dan Lula vs Elizabeth McClain / Robert Pellymounter6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - 6.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Dan Lula
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Aditya Moorthy
published 3.5
2.93
Stacy Ball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Aline MacK
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.85
Lourdes Duarte
published
2.81
Scott Carrithers
published
2.79
Juli Dershewitz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
David Gillham
published 3
2.48
Grace Gillham
published
Peter Na
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Lula + Aline MacK404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dan Lula
138W–81L career · 8 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Aditya Moorthy
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Stacy Ball
131W–150L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Aline MacK
71W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.86
Lourdes Duarte
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Scott Carrithers
13W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Juli Dershewitz
62W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
David Gillham
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Grace Gillham
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%57%43%
2.48
Peter Na
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.