Teams

McManus

2025 Loudoun Singles · Loudoun Singles 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-23vs McMullenLost 01
L#1 SinglesJulianne Nitta vs Sueyun Hsieh3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-16vs WilsonLost 01
L#3 SinglesJennifer Annessa vs Maryam Aranee4-6, 6-6, 0-1
2025-10-10vs Fulkerson - Stoneleigh 3.5 SinglesLost 01
L#2 SinglesJulianne Nitta vs Katie Budnyk5-7, 5-4
2025-10-06vs Fulkerson - Stoneleigh 3.5 SinglesLost 02
L#2 SinglesJennifer Annessa vs Bree Ayotte3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Patricia Yriart6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-10-03vs Creighton Farms - Mowry 3.5Lost 01
L#3 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Allison Quinly0-6, 3-6
2025-09-24vs McMullenWon 10
W#2 SinglesJulianne Nitta vs Katharine Nassauer6-4, 6-2
2025-09-10vs Creighton Farms - Mowry 3.5Lost 01
L#3 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Afsoun Semsar4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Julianne Nitta
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Milagros Shepard
published
3.40
Julie Kane
published
3.34
Hannah Auyang
published 3.5
3.27
Eleanor McManus
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Anne Flam
published 3.5
3.25
Anne Marie Randolph
published 3.5
3.21
Jennifer Annessa
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Cynthia Pointer
published 3.5
3.07
Jeannie Matteson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eleanor McManus + Jennifer Annessa4167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julianne Nitta
255W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Milagros Shepard
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Julie Kane
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Hannah Auyang
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Eleanor McManus
187W–113L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anne Flam
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Anne Marie Randolph
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alexandra Kardasilari
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jennifer Annessa
71W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Cynthia Pointer
106W–128L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jeannie Matteson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.