Teams

Northern/Meyertholen/40&Over3.0W

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 3.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-22vs Fettes/Miller: Minnesota SliceWon 10
W#4 DoublesCatherine Hosamane / Adona Rabago vs Brenda Jewell / Laura Sheak7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-15vs Kollitz/Coetzee: hot shotsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Angel Chandler5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / Michele Kolar vs Amanda Mroczenski / Dawn Meyers6-3, 6-1
2025-07-08vs Hoffer/BeaudoinWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeredith Stromberg / Catherine Hosamane vs Anne Crepps / Christina Dawson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / KJ Madison vs Ana Carter / Brenda Neve7-5, 6-3
2025-06-24vs Fettes/Miller: Minnesota SliceLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeredith Stromberg / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Renee Wixon / Sara Fenstermacher4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesKJ Madison / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Lindsey Rain / Christine Swanson6-3, 6-2
2025-06-10vs Murphy: Alley CatsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Hosamane / Meredith Stromberg vs Kyra Schmitt / Deirdre Palmer6-3, 6-1
2025-05-27vs Kollitz/Coetzee: hot shotsWon 41
L#1 DoublesKJ Madison / Sandra Marble vs Pauline Bangma / Jane Kollitz6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSharia Carlson vs Tiffany Liebert6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSu Ann DeGeorgeo / Kimberly Reed vs Angel Chandler / Erika James6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichele Kolar / Gabrielle Meyertholen vs Kimberly Miller / Linda Coetzee6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesMaria Annette MacAriola / Maureen Wollak vs Joan Weber / Heather McCann6-2, 6-4
2025-05-20vs Amundson: Summer CrushersWon 20
W#1 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / KJ Madison vs Carol Culligan / Eileen Stanley6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Kristina Shaffer7-6, 6-0
2025-05-13vs Amundson: Summer CrushersWon 10
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Consuelo Gutierrez-Crosby6-2, 6-2
2025-05-06vs Hoffer/BeaudoinLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Marble / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Julie Hoffer / Lorna Mah Lee4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
KJ Madison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Catherine Hosamane
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.14
Kimberly Reed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Meredith Stromberg
published
3.11
Gina Collins
published
3.05
Gabrielle Meyertholen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Su Ann DeGeorgeo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Aleksandra Fermstad
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Maureen Wollak
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Kathleen Hultman
published
2.87
Sharia Carlson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Anita Sukur
published 3
2.82
Kathleen Danner
published
2.77
Maria Annette MacAriola
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Lisa Timek
published
2.66
Adona Rabago
published 3
Michele Kolar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Marble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Collins + Su Ann DeGeorgeo5071% games+11.2% vs expected
Kimberly Reed + Su Ann DeGeorgeo7557% games+11.1% vs expected
Catherine Hosamane + KJ Madison4350% games+4.9% vs expected
Aleksandra Fermstad + Lisa Timek4259% games+1.1% vs expected
Catherine Hosamane + Aleksandra Fermstad7162% games+0.0% vs expected
Maureen Wollak + Kathleen Hultman224 matchesnot enough data
Aleksandra Fermstad + Gina Collins303 matchesnot enough data
Maria Annette MacAriola + Maureen Wollak213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KJ Madison
43W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
3.5
Catherine Hosamane
163W–105L career · 14 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Kimberly Reed
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Meredith Stromberg
54W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Gina Collins
25W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Gabrielle Meyertholen
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Su Ann DeGeorgeo
30W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Aleksandra Fermstad
117W–53L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Maureen Wollak
29W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Kathleen Hultman
49W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Sharia Carlson
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Anita Sukur
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Kathleen Danner
16W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Maria Annette MacAriola
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Lisa Timek
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Adona Rabago
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Michele Kolar
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Marble
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.