Teams

DTC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrew Brookens vs Paul Krueger6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-07-18vs DTP REDWon 20
W#1 SinglesAndrew Brookens vs Michael Nobles6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesStephen Ehrlich / Paul Suter vs Brent Eklund / David Richter6-0, 7-5
2023-07-12vs CACM REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesAndrew Brookens vs Dirk McDermott6-4, 6-3
2023-06-28vs GPTC BLUESplit 11
W#1 SinglesAndrew Brookens vs Andres Seijas6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLloyd-Norton Cutler / Gary Orazio vs Brian Mixon / James Wagner3-6, 5-7
2023-06-21vs WP-G NAVYWon 20
W#1 SinglesAndrew Brookens vs Michael DiFilipo6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLloyd-Norton Cutler / William Nelson vs Hector Pardo Garcia - (DQ)* / Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-14vs SKY REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesAndrew Brookens vs Coupar Lester6-2, 6-3
2023-06-07vs CACM REDLost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrew Brookens vs Dirk McDermott2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Andrew Brookens
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.94
Richard Best
published
3.68
Robert Falkenberg
published
3.57
William Nelson
published
3.57
Paul Suter
published
3.55
Lloyd-Norton Cutler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Stephen Ehrlich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Terry Wong
published
Frank Visciano
published
Steven Blumberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Blumberg + Robert Falkenberg4255% games−3.9% vs expected
Terry Wong + Stephen Ehrlich224 matchesnot enough data
Lloyd-Norton Cutler + Stephen Ehrlich044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Brookens
52W–17L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
4.09
Richard Best
32W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.94
Robert Falkenberg
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
William Nelson
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
Paul Suter
7W–31L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Lloyd-Norton Cutler
77W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Stephen Ehrlich
45W–36L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Terry Wong
24W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
Frank Visciano
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Blumberg
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.