Teams

THull (Life Time)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Men - Mon PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDamian Hamp-Adams / Brandon Pruski vs Ken DeHart / Steven Johnson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-09-25vs TFarley (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDamian Hamp-Adams / Brandon Pruski vs Keith Lowe / Juan Sintes6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-18vs JMorse (JCC)Split 11
L#2 DoublesDamian Hamp-Adams / Brandon Pruski vs Jeff Morse / Jeffrey Kuykendal2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMarc Wojnowich / Brad Howington vs Greg Hobby / RONALD TOWNSEND3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-04vs JDichak (WSRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKyle Jenkins / Damian Hamp-Adams vs Eric Bostic / Alberto Botero6-0, 6-2
2023-08-28vs GEstrada (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSharath Budipalli / Damian Hamp-Adams vs Gerardo Estrada / Daniel Gonzalez7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-21vs HPence (PLCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Ferreira / Damian Hamp-Adams vs Donald VanCott / Brett Basden6-1, 6-2
2023-08-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarc Wojnowich / Kyle Jenkins vs Austin Grabowski / Beau Bagley6-4, 7-5
2023-08-09vs TFarley (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDamian Hamp-Adams / Kevin Ferreira vs Robert Sledd / Keith Lowe4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Thomas Hull
published
3.57
Kevin Ferreira
published
3.54
Steven Inga
published
3.52
Damian Hamp-Adams
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.41
Jeff Cohen
published
3.27
Brandon Pruski
published 3.5
3.25
Marc Wojnowich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.90
Brad Howington
published 3
Sharath Budipalli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Ferreira + Steven Inga6358% games+8.0% vs expected
Thomas Hull + Damian Hamp-Adams404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Hull
49W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.59
Kevin Ferreira
40W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
Steven Inga
23W–10L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Damian Hamp-Adams
76W–53L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jeff Cohen
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Brandon Pruski
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Marc Wojnowich
32W–25L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Brad Howington
7W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Sharath Budipalli
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.