Teams

Pinellas/Orsini/40&Over9.0X

2025 Pinellas Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 9.0 MXD

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-08vs McMullen King 9.0xLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Wager / Josh Melton vs David King / Elizabeth Baldwin1-6, 5-7
2025-03-30vs McMullen King 9.0xLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Wager / DONALD CRAWLEY vs Karen Blount / Greg Hilbert2-6, 3-6
2025-03-29vs McMullen King 9.0xWon 20
W#1 DoublesGail Gibson / Josh Melton vs Mike Moenter / Katie Healy6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesManuel Alvarez / Kim Cashman-King vs Elizabeth Baldwin / David King6-2, 6-1
2025-03-26vs McMullen King 9.0xSplit 11
L#1 DoublesManuel Alvarez / Stephanie Wager vs Mike Moenter / Katie Healy4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJamie Mckibban / Kim Cashman-King vs Matthew Schnell / Dianne Albina6-2, 6-2
2025-03-16vs McMullen King 9.0xWon 10
W#2 DoublesJamie Mckibban / Rikke Kemp vs Dianne Albina / Matthew Schnell6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-08vs McMullen King 9.0xWon 10
W#2 DoublesGail Gibson / DONALD CRAWLEY vs David King / Pamela Saffran6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 MXD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aly Peterson
published 5
4.44
Gail Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.40
Jamie Mckibban
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.39
Manuel Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Stephanie Wager
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Kim Cashman-King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Rikke Kemp
published
3.94
Amy Lyons
published 4.5
3.90
Josh Melton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Ken Jackson
published
Scott Schuhriemen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Wager + Jamie Mckibban3260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Aly Peterson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gail Gibson
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.44
4.5
Jamie Mckibban
109W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
Manuel Alvarez
22W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Stephanie Wager
55W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.39
Kim Cashman-King
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
4.25
Rikke Kemp
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Amy Lyons
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
Josh Melton
33W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
DONALD CRAWLEY
472W–252L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Ken Jackson
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Scott Schuhriemen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.