Teams

BAREFOOT (55)

2024 South East Tennis Combo 55 & over · Mens 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Barefoot / Gerard Schwartzel vs Edward Knox / John Murray3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-09-30vs Reilly BreenLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Barefoot / Michael Duckworth vs Michael Breen / Michael Osborn3-6, 2-6
2024-09-25vs O'Connor /O'ConnorWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Barefoot / John Schoolfield vs Kevin Daly / Kevin OConnor7-5, 7-6
2024-09-23vs HicksLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Barefoot / Stephen Berman vs Steve Horvath / Dean Wilson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-09-18vs ParkerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Barefoot / JONATHAN BALKCUM vs Stephen Parker / Deric Weiss2-6, 2-6
2024-09-09vs Melcher/Sass BFLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Barefoot / JONATHAN BALKCUM vs Dennis Lambi / Tim Pelczar3-6, 3-6
2024-08-28vs Reilly BreenWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Barefoot / JONATHAN BALKCUM vs Cliff Zoller / Jerry Klawitter6-4, 6-4
2024-08-16vs ParkerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Barefoot / JONATHAN BALKCUM vs Stephen Parker / Deric Weiss1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Ed Vogelsong
published
3.80
James Seidel
published
3.75
Michael Barefoot
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.68
Young O'Connor
published
3.33
JONATHAN BALKCUM
published
3.31
Michael Duckworth
published
3.30
Edward Everett
published
Gerard Schwartzel
published
John Schoolfield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Duckworth + Edward Everett6554% games+4.3% vs expected
Ed Vogelsong + Michael Barefoot5256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ed Vogelsong
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
James Seidel
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Michael Barefoot
199W–122L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Young O'Connor
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
JONATHAN BALKCUM
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Michael Duckworth
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
Edward Everett
25W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
Gerard Schwartzel
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Schoolfield
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.