Teams

Williams-Allen-CC

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Spring · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-01vs CORTA/Lisa GalbraithLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Williams-Allen / Jamie Smith vs Sue Goldman / Sherry Bunn0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDarlene Marshall / Tracey Olds vs Rena Wilson / Elizabeth Borom6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEunice Ampiaw / Kimberly Beck vs Louise Dillard / Tracy Dean3-6, 3-6
2025-02-02vs CORTA/Lisa GalbraithWon 21
W#1 DoublesDarlene Marshall / Tracey Olds vs Rena Wilson / Robin Snipes7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPat Majestic / Amy Nelson vs Rashmi Hudson / Paula Watkins6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelodie Broderick / Jamie Smith vs Lisa Galbraith / Leslie Bruder2-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Darlene Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Kimberly Beck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Maureen Bolinger
published
3.00
Cheryl Williams-Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Melodie Broderick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Eunice Ampiaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Tracey Olds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Pat Majestic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Niki Gedroic
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Joy Obebe
published
Lisa Mathis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Williams-Allen + Pat Majestic2641% games−6.0% vs expected
Tracey Olds + Darlene Marshall224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Beck + Darlene Marshall224 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Williams-Allen + Darlene Marshall213 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Olds + Kimberly Beck033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darlene Marshall
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Kimberly Beck
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Maureen Bolinger
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Cheryl Williams-Allen
12W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Melodie Broderick
16W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Eunice Ampiaw
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78
Tracey Olds
52W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
Pat Majestic
15W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
0%6%94%
2.72
Niki Gedroic
17W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Joy Obebe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Mathis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.