Teams

EM-Smith Emerald Gems (65s 6.5W)

2026 Neuse River Combo 65 & Over · 65s 6.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 65s 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EM-Smith Emerald Gems (65s 6.5W)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Lisa Zurawski
published
2.89
Kathryn Custer
published
2.87
Terry Shoup
published
2.76
Luann Scruggs
published
Gayle Daras
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Shoup + Luann Scruggs044 matchesnot enough data
Gayle Daras + Terry Shoup123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Zurawski
11W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
Kathryn Custer
13W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Terry Shoup
5W–13L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.87
Luann Scruggs
3W–14L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Gayle Daras
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.