Teams

Park Fit Club-Central Park Dynamic 55s

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 MEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-20vs WCCP-WillmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesEric Seaman / James Cramer vs Robert Vancott / Michael Moloney6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohn Bumgarner / Zane Schafer vs John Omlin / Mark Gray6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Anderson / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Bill Popp / Clark Richards6-4, 6-2
2024-10-20vs EW-PC-KohanLost 12
W#1 DoublesBill Schoultz / James Cramer vs Steven McMurray / Larry Bagaasen6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesClinton Marvel / John Bumgarner vs Wayne Kohan / Don Donais2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJerry Henderson / Kevin Collins vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Kent Ozkardesh6-7, 4-6
2024-10-19vs EW-PC-KohanLost 12
L#1 DoublesJerry Henderson / Kevin Collins vs Wayne Kohan / Don Donais4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEric Seaman / James Cramer vs Bryan Coles / Kent Ozkardesh6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBill Schoultz / Clinton Marvel vs Steven McMurray / Ken Holle2-6, 3-6
2024-10-19vs PC-GavinoLost 12
W#1 DoublesClinton Marvel / John Bumgarner vs Marc Spinner / John Hilmes6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Anderson / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Bart Munson / Craig Hansen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEric Seaman / James Cramer vs Derek Peacock / Daryl Brown5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-10-18vs WCCP-WillmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric Seaman / James Cramer vs Jeffrey Gillespie / Sean Lumsden5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Anderson / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Ray Willman / John Omlin2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesClinton Marvel / Zane Schafer vs Robert Vancott / Michael Moloney6-2, 6-2
2024-10-18vs PC-GavinoWon 30
W#1 DoublesJerry Henderson / Kevin Collins vs Emmitt Jackson / John Smoot6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrew Anderson / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Roman Gavino / Craig Hansen6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBill Schoultz / John Bumgarner vs Daryl Brown / Derek Peacock6-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Kohan6014411129
2Park Fit Club-Central Park Dynamic 55s3311718160
3PC-Gavino3371123182
4WCCP-Willman0641430204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Zane Schafer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Pat Nevin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Richard Dean Hendrickson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Andrew Anderson
published 3.5
Bruno Caprez
published 3.5
Chester Richey
published 3.5
David Roth
published 3.5
3.11
Clinton Marvel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Bill Schoultz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Jerry Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Dean Gray
published
Eric Seaman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
James Cramer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
John Bumgarner
published
Kevin Collins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chester Richey + Bill Schoultz5061% games+6.9% vs expected
Pat Nevin + Bill Schoultz6654% games+3.9% vs expected
Clinton Marvel + John Bumgarner5851% games−2.5% vs expected
Jerry Henderson + Clinton Marvel7750% games−5.0% vs expected
Jerry Henderson + Bill Schoultz71045% games−6.9% vs expected
Kevin Collins + Clinton Marvel4846% games−9.3% vs expected
Kevin Collins + Jerry Henderson7552% games−11.5% vs expected
Kevin Collins + Pat Nevin61246% games−11.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zane Schafer
38W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Pat Nevin
78W–108L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Richard Dean Hendrickson
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrew Anderson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bruno Caprez
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chester Richey
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Roth
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Clinton Marvel
46W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Bill Schoultz
34W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Jerry Henderson
54W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Dean Gray
11W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eric Seaman
46W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
James Cramer
19W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Bumgarner
14W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Collins
29W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.