Teams

MacAriola: Tough Love

2026 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-19vs Johnson Smash SquadWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaura Maki / Maureen Wollak vs Michelle Pelland / Kate Schuenke6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesClaudia Chapman vs Sharia Carlson1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Jackson / Luisa Wahlstrom vs Barb Johnson / Jessica Galatz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Quinn / Maria Annette MacAriola vs Jodi Danielson / Stephanie Downs7-6, 6-3
2026-03-12vs Johnson Smash SquadLost 23
L#1 DoublesMaureen Wollak / Bernadette MacKey vs Ronna Johnson / Meredith Stromberg2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJessica Maurer vs Amy Browender6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Quinn / Rachel Johnson vs Jessica Galatz / Lisa Neddermeyer6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCorazon Fos vs Brook Holzinger4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLuoyu Shen / Marie Stodolka vs Laurie Riepe / Katy Petersen4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-05vs Overserved Jackson-GrimaldiWon 32
L#1 DoublesBernadette MacKey / Laura Maki vs Wendy Nguyen / Ilana Fromer5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLuoyu Shen vs Sarah Jackson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Jackson / Claudia Chapman vs Pamela Snyder / Jenny Javitch2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCorazon Fos vs Danielle Grimaldi6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLuisa Wahlstrom / Marie Stodolka vs Lauren Zaba / Lorie Korpi7-5, 6-4
2026-02-26vs Graham: Tennis the MenaceSplit 22
L#1 DoublesClaudia Chapman / Corazon Fos vs Molly Matsumoto / Courtney Trescher7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBernadette MacKey / Rachel Johnson vs Miriam Deskin / Nicole Fallon6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesDana Schimmel vs Kayla Malik1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMaria Cecilia Ray / Luoyu Shen vs Ranita Quale / Rana Khoury6-2, 6-1
2026-02-19vs Stordahl Kickin AcesSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCorazon Fos / Maureen Wollak vs Dina VanderWaal / Lisa Sheppard Pearson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLuisa Wahlstrom / Nancy Quinn vs Ana Paula Zamorano / Kelly Stordahl6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJessica Maurer vs Beth Hank4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Cecilia Ray / Marie Stodolka vs Karen Ring / Kashmira Sampat6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-12vs Reinhart's Volley Girls_W26Won 40
W#1 DoublesLaura Maki / Claudia Chapman vs Amy Graves / Jenna Graves6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJessica Maurer vs Uyen Pham6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Johnson / Nancy Quinn vs Ann Cadwell / Arianna Harmon4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmmie Nelson / Marie Stodolka vs Jennifer Voegele / Jennifer Kennedy6-1, 6-4
2026-02-05vs Thomas: RacquettesLost 13
L#1 DoublesEmily Jackson / Maria Cecilia Ray vs Molly Oconnell / Margaret Christopher3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmmie Nelson vs Morgan Arch3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Annette MacAriola / Nancy Quinn vs Elizabeth Golembiewski / Cynthia Segura6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Schimmel / Rachel Johnson vs Christine Thomas / Hanna Weil3-6, 1-6
2026-01-29vs Fermstad: Gone With the WinWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Maki / Maureen Wollak vs Anita Sukur / Kelly Bartsh6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaria Cecilia Ray / Emily Jackson vs Mya Kesler / Stephanie DeArmond6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Johnson / Jessica Maurer vs Lisa Timek / Su Ann DeGeorgeo3-6, 1-6
2026-01-15vs Overserved Jackson-GrimaldiLost 13
W#1 DoublesClaudia Chapman / Maureen Wollak vs Amanda Getchell / Allison Perry6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLuisa Wahlstrom / Nancy Quinn vs Pamela Londer / Ilana Fromer3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDana Schimmel vs Mary Idzik1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Stodolka / Maria Cecilia Ray vs Danielle Grimaldi / Jill Miller7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-01-08vs Graham: Tennis the MenaceLost 23
W#1 DoublesLaura Maki / Maureen Wollak vs Megan Knoch-Dohlin / Hannah Siegel6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJessica Maurer vs Kathleen Danner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBernadette MacKey / Rachel Johnson vs Kelly Vegoe / Emily Vegoe5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLuoyu Shen vs Courtney Trescher3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAmmie Nelson / Maria Annette MacAriola vs Miriam Deskin / Pam Koch6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Maureen Wollak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Luisa Wahlstrom
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Corazon Fos
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Claudia Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.77
Maria Annette MacAriola
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Ammie Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.75
Jessica Maurer
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.73
Laura Maki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Rachel Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Marie Stodolka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Bernadette MacKey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Maria Cecilia Ray
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.54
Luoyu Shen
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.10
Dana Schimmel
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Chapman + Maureen Wollak2349% games+2.6% vs expected
Laura Maki + Maureen Wollak6260% games+2.5% vs expected
Maria Cecilia Ray + Marie Stodolka3453% games−3.7% vs expected
Rachel Johnson + Bernadette MacKey6752% games−4.2% vs expected
Bernadette MacKey + Maureen Wollak7945% games−10.2% vs expected
Bernadette MacKey + Laura Maki044 matchesnot enough data
Maria Annette MacAriola + Maureen Wollak213 matchesnot enough data
Maria Cecilia Ray + Luoyu Shen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen Wollak
29W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Luisa Wahlstrom
59W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Corazon Fos
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Claudia Chapman
13W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Maria Annette MacAriola
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ammie Nelson
4W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Jessica Maurer
16W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Laura Maki
15W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Rachel Johnson
14W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Marie Stodolka
14W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Bernadette MacKey
13W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Maria Cecilia Ray
17W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Luoyu Shen
8W–20L career · 12 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
2.5
Dana Schimmel
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.