Teams

Warner

2024 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W Adult 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-28vs BahorskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Britt / Michelle Eubanks vs Kathy Beggs / Elizabeth Hawkins6-1, 7-5
2024-03-21vs KjellerupLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Stacy Chick vs Jennifer Kjellerup / Lori Elliott4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Fang Liang3-6, 4-6
2024-03-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesTheresa Harrell / Michelle Eubanks vs Cathy Kendall / Elizabeth Murray6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Jennifer Winegardner6-0, 6-0
2024-02-15vs KjellerupWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Fang Liang6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Yealdhall / Elizabeth Bussey vs Rhonda Tullos / Melissa Johnson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-02-08Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Jessica Bahorski6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-02-01vs KjellerupLost 02
L#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Fang Liang2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Stacy Chick vs Lori Elliott / Tracey Cohen3-6, 3-6
2024-01-18Won 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Jessica Bahorski6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Stacy Chick vs Susan Carey / Elizabeth Murray6-2, 6-1
2024-01-11vs KjellerupLost 12
L#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Fang Liang2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Warner / Michelle Eubanks vs Rhonda Tullos / Lori Elliott6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Yealdhall / Elizabeth Bussey vs Kim Thriffiley / Melissa Johnson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Jennifer Britt
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.69
Lisa Graganella
published
3.66
Michelle Eubanks
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Stacy Chick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.58
Amy Otis
published 4
3.33
Anna Jones
published 4
Maria Yealdhall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Chick + Michelle Eubanks432852% games−6.2% vs expected
Jennifer Britt + Michelle Eubanks303 matchesnot enough data
Anna Jones + Lisa Graganella303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Britt
111W–44L career · 8 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Lisa Graganella
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Michelle Eubanks
157W–99L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Stacy Chick
59W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Lisa Franson
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.60
4
Amy Otis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Anna Jones
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.33
Maria Yealdhall
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.