Teams

DiGaetano/JB/3Oaks

2025 Adult 55 & Over Spring League · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-28vs Khilling/JB/JCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesTanya Ellington / Jacqueline Gammill vs Deana Muegge / Stefanie Rouse7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKarla Nortier / Theresa Book vs Joan Khilling / Angie Fegtly6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShelly Little / Linda Smith vs Jackie Pardew / Kimberly Moseley6-1, 6-3
2025-04-24vs Khilling/JB/JCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Gammill / Tanya Ellington vs Joan Khilling / Valerie Rainwater6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKarla Nortier / Shelly Little vs Stefanie Rouse / Deana Muegge7-5
W#3 DoublesSusa Digaetano / Theresa Book vs Angie Fegtly / Jackie Pardew7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-31vs Khilling/JB/JCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusa Digaetano / Karla Nortier vs Angie Fegtly / Stefanie Rouse6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKyoko Graham / Linda Smith vs Jackie Pardew / Deana Muegge6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTanya Ellington / Jacqueline Gammill vs Donna Jones / Kimberly Moseley6-1, 6-1
2025-03-27vs Khilling/JB/JCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusa Digaetano / Tanya Ellington vs Joan Khilling / Angie Fegtly6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKarla Nortier / Jacqueline Gammill vs Deana Muegge / Stefanie Rouse6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Smith / Theresa Book vs Kimberly Moseley / Valerie Rainwater6-1, 6-2
2025-03-20vs Khilling/JB/JCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKarla Nortier / Susa Digaetano vs Valerie Rainwater / Angie Fegtly6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Ellington / Jacqueline Gammill vs Joan Khilling / Stefanie Rouse4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKyoko Graham / Theresa Book vs Donna Jones / Deana Muegge3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Kyoko Graham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Tanya Ellington
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.66
Jacqueline Gammill
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.64
Karla Nortier
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.59
Theresa Book
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
Shelly Little
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susa Digaetano
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susa Digaetano + Karla Nortier2336% games+0.4% vs expected
Jacqueline Gammill + Tanya Ellington3943% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyoko Graham
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Tanya Ellington
7W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jacqueline Gammill
6W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Karla Nortier
8W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Theresa Book
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
Shelly Little
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
2.52
Susa Digaetano
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.