Teams

Dickerson

2023 Frederick Adult 40 & Over · Frederick Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-29vs DeAgostinoWon 10
W#2 DoublesGail Shenk / Kim Roberts vs Monica DeAgostino / Lori Grimaldi6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-26vs DeAgostinoLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusanne Gibbons / Anja Abbott vs Lori Grimaldi / Monica DeAgostino6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-04-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesKim Roberts / Susanne Gibbons vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-26vs DeAgostinoLost 01
L#3 DoublesGail Shenk / Joanna Ficklin vs Kristen Hostler / Veronica Best3-6, 2-6
2023-03-22vs DeAgostinoLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoanna Ficklin / Susanne Gibbons vs Carrie Derse / Veronica Best1-6, 2-6
2023-03-12vs DeAgostinoLost 01
L#3 DoublesGail Shenk / Malissa Hudson vs Maureen DeGrange / Carrie Derse2-6, 1-6
2023-03-10vs DeAgostinoLost 01
L#3 DoublesStacey Donaldson / Gail Shenk vs Lesley Leonard / Maureen DeGrange3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Traci Bidinger
published
3.06
Susanne Gibbons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Joanna Ficklin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.88
Jennifer Willie
published
2.81
Gail Shenk
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Christie Gray
published 3
2.71
Erika Gilbert
published
2.62
Robin Dickerson
published
Kim Roberts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Ficklin + Gail Shenk10754% games+5.8% vs expected
Jennifer Willie + Joanna Ficklin12555% games+2.8% vs expected
Jennifer Willie + Gail Shenk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Traci Bidinger
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.30
3
Susanne Gibbons
134W–126L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Joanna Ficklin
72W–80L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Jennifer Willie
26W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Gail Shenk
131W–119L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Christie Gray
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Erika Gilbert
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Robin Dickerson
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
Kim Roberts
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.