Teams

RVora-UNC

2026 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-16vs JByrd-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesEric Shen vs Burak Erdim0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesEamonn Lanigan vs Casey Collins5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-22vs SClausnitzer-CHCCWon 10
W#2 SinglesDerek Saccoccio vs Kyle Droppers6-1, 6-3
2026-06-15vs JBowers-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesPeter Z Tawil vs James Bowers6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRuchir Vora vs Matt Williamson6-0, 6-1
2026-06-08Won 10
W#2 SinglesRuchir Vora vs Joe Gonzalez6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-01vs JByrd-DURLost 01
L#2 SinglesPeter Z Tawil vs Aaron Kirschenfeld4-6, 0-6
2026-05-15vs AYoung-EVWon 30
W#1 SinglesEric Shen vs Robert Singagliese6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEamonn Lanigan vs Arash Chehrazi6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesDerek Saccoccio vs Zach Rowles6-3, 7-5
2026-05-11vs SClausnitzer-CHCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesDerek Saccoccio vs Jim Brantley4-6, 6-7
2026-05-04vs JBowers-HRWon 30
W#1 SinglesPeter Z Tawil vs Caleb Kent6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesEamonn Lanigan vs Michael Klein6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesRuchir Vora vs John Harlow6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RVora-UNC5316817161
2SClausnitzer-CHCC53131125201
3AYoung-EV2661837227
4JBowers-HR0842042274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Eamonn Lanigan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Peter Z Tawil
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.40
Derek Saccoccio
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Ruchir Vora
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Eric Shen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Saccoccio + Ruchir Vora123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eamonn Lanigan
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Peter Z Tawil
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Derek Saccoccio
132W–95L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Ruchir Vora
72W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Eric Shen
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.