Teams

Horn/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Men - Saturday Daytime

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-05-09vs Alessi/Pershad/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesConnor Horn / William Allen vs Yash Pershad / Max Grushin4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCJ Monte / Ryan Moss vs Joseph Wrubel / Andrew Stankiewicz3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNicholas Cook / Mark Hirst vs Philippe Bronchtein / Ben Reimer2-6, 1-6
2026-03-14vs Cooke/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Garde / Sunil Krishnan vs John Hollinsworth / Jake Turner6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPejman Behrouzi vs Campbell Luschen7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRaymond Clark / Rhett Brandt vs Chad Arnold / Troy HIPPENSTEEL5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men - Saturday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Theo Smith
published
3.08
Mark Hirst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Michael Drescher
published
2.95
Connor Horn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Nicholas Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Michael Garde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Wade Shrivalle
published
2.85
Pejman Behrouzi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Sunil Krishnan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
CJ Monte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
David Eagan
published 3
2.69
Raymond Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Rhett Brandt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Garde + Sunil Krishnan3255% games+6.2% vs expected
Michael Drescher + Mark Hirst2548% gamesnot enough data
Nicholas Cook + Theo Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Cook + David Eagan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Theo Smith
18W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.32
Mark Hirst
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Michael Drescher
14W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Connor Horn
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Nicholas Cook
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Michael Garde
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Wade Shrivalle
10W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Pejman Behrouzi
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Sunil Krishnan
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
CJ Monte
9W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
David Eagan
8W–11L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Raymond Clark
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Rhett Brandt
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.