Teams

Served & Confused (Reyes-Teach)

2026 STL Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Combined

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-04vs Love-All Legends (Reyes-Teach)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Leclerc / Erin LeClerc vs Anna Alonzo / Joe Alonzo Jr6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCara Artman / Arthur Jordan vs Justin Fox / Tracy Duggins6-0, 6-1
2026-07-28vs DivinLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Traigle / Sona Patel vs Brett Miller / Kerry Jones5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCara Artman / Arthur Jordan vs Pam Henze / Brett Wiese6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNancy Brown / Luke Stuerman vs Lori Divin / Joe Henze3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-21vs Love-All Legends (Reyes-Teach)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Leclerc / Erin LeClerc vs Anna Alonzo / Joe Alonzo Jr6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Brown / Jeffrey Traigle vs Michelle Scott / Justin Fox5-7, 4-6
2026-07-07vs DivinWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin LeClerc / John Leclerc vs Julie Miller / Brett Miller6-3, 6-2
2026-06-16vs DivinLost 02
L#1 DoublesSona Patel / Jeffrey Traigle vs Julie Miller / Brett Miller4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Brown / Luke Stuerman vs Lori Divin / Joe Henze1-6, 4-6
2026-06-09vs Love-All Legends (Reyes-Teach)Won 20
W#1 DoublesCara Artman / Jeffrey Traigle vs Justin Fox / Bisiayo Fashemi6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Brown / Luke Stuerman vs Tracy Duggins / Kenneth Fredrick6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Divin5113514133
2Served & Confused (Reyes-Teach)3310817127
3Love-All Legends (Reyes-Teach)1541429184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Sona Patel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Cara Artman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Erin LeClerc
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Jeffrey Traigle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.51
Arthur Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.39
ROSELYN REYES-TEACH
published
John Leclerc
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Luke Stuerman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin LeClerc + John Leclerc6073% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sona Patel
31W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Cara Artman
67W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Erin LeClerc
51W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Jeffrey Traigle
63W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Arthur Jordan
9W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
ROSELYN REYES-TEACH
29W–51L career · no lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
John Leclerc
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luke Stuerman
12W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.