Teams

Li.Kempf18A4.0

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-16vs Sa.Wood18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesRachael Kiker / Theresa Stone vs Chunhui Higgins / Claire Songkakul1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Beate Steffen vs Sandy Wood / Nora Lenahan4-6, 0-6
2024-05-12vs An.Koltchagova18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesSandra Chapman-Wilson / Theresa Stone vs Emily Culbreth / Barbara Timinskas6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesErika Grenier / Rachael Kiker vs Lisa Buyaki / Anna Koltchagova7-5, 7-5
2024-04-21vs Sa.Rhoades18AWon 10
W#3 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Beate Steffen vs Kaitlin Johnston / Lauren King7-5, 6-4
2024-04-14vs Mc.Osman18AWon 20
W#2 DoublesEmily Johnson / Sandra Chapman-Wilson vs McKenzie Keenan Osman / Rachel Matthews6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Lisa Kempf vs Yvonne Barrow / Julia Kerr6-0, 6-2
2024-04-10vs Sa.Wood18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesRachael Kiker / Christine Reinke vs Laura McNiven / Nora Lenahan6-7, 3-6
2024-03-10vs Sa.Rhoades18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Jones / Rachael Kiker vs Sandra Rhoades / Holly Moore3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLisa Kempf / Ashley McCollum vs Haleigh Broglin / Kaitlin Johnston3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-03-03vs Mc.Osman18AWon 21
L#1 DoublesTheresa Stone / Sandra Chapman-Wilson vs Alvina Oelhafen / Jennifer Hogshead4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Johnson / Rachael Kiker vs Elizabeth Matthews / Yvonne Barrow6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Lisa Kempf vs Rachel Matthews / Julia Kerr6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Rachael Kiker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.82
Christina Jenkins
published 3.5
3.69
Elise Hamilton
published
3.64
Sandra Chapman-Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Theresa Stone
published
3.53
Ashley McCollum
published 3.5
3.48
Christine Reinke
published 3.5
3.42
Beate Steffen
published 3.5
3.38
Lisa Kempf
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Lydia Pasteris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Erika Grenier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lydia Pasteris + Lisa Kempf6547% gamesnot enough data
Rachael Kiker + Sandra Chapman-Wilson5360% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Kempf + Elise Hamilton224 matchesnot enough data
Lydia Pasteris + Beate Steffen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rachael Kiker
162W–90L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
3.5
Christina Jenkins
34W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.82
Elise Hamilton
37W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.69
4
Sandra Chapman-Wilson
90W–127L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Theresa Stone
8W–21L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Ashley McCollum
24W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.53
3.5
Christine Reinke
47W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Beate Steffen
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Lisa Kempf
365W–300L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Lydia Pasteris
118W–96L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Erika Grenier
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.