Teams

Deep Run Kelly

2026 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 9.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-28vs Burkwood - Decker Mix 40 9.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Rowe / Laura Lafors vs Edward Butterworth / Susan Powell3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAbigail Dryden / Patrick Gee vs Katherine Carnohan / Keith Harvey2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLauren Palmer / Ryan Baker vs Leslie Butterworth / Adam Decker7-5, 6-4
2026-07-13vs Burkwood - Decker Mix 40 9.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Lafors / Brian Rowe vs Erin Decker / Tyler Sinsabaugh6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTom Bryan / Allison Engel vs Susan Powell / Edward Butterworth5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / Mike Webb vs Leslie Butterworth / Adam Decker2-6, 4-6
2026-07-08vs Belmont - GregoryWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / Tom Bryan vs Lindsay Bazydlo / Diego Alejandro Parada1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Lafors / Ryan Baker vs Karolyn Hall / Ben Hall6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Altaffer / Todd Prince vs Jill Campbell / Wayne Motley6-4, 6-3
2026-06-26vs Belmont - GregoryLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / Brian Rowe vs Diego Alejandro Parada / Lindsay Bazydlo5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Palmer / Ryan Baker vs Heather Barefoot / Konstantin Dombrovskiy6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesClara Laing / Mike Webb vs Jill Campbell / Ben Hall7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-23vs Burkwood - Decker Mix 40 9.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Alwine / Brian Rowe vs Susan Powell / Edward Butterworth6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Jones / Patrick Gee vs Ashley Hart / Cary Polk6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesClara Laing / Mike Webb vs Katherine Carnohan / Keith Harvey4-6, 5-5
2026-06-17vs Belmont - GregoryLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Engel / Todd Prince vs Lindsay Bazydlo / Diego Alejandro Parada2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAbigail Dryden / Patrick Gee vs Heather Barefoot / Konstantin Dombrovskiy6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Alwine / Tom Bryan vs Jenny Murray / Tommy Bader6-4, 6-3
2026-05-29vs Belmont - GregoryWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / David Lefkowitz vs Karolyn Hall / Wayne Motley6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLeslie Altaffer / Ryan Baker vs Lindsay Hardage / Konstantin Dombrovskiy6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAllison Engel / Mike Webb vs Jenny Murray / Tommy Bader6-4, 6-2
2026-05-18vs Burkwood - Decker Mix 40 9.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / David Lefkowitz vs Susan Powell / Edward Butterworth4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Jones / Patrick Gee vs Erin Decker / Brett Sinsabaugh5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllison Engel / Tom Bryan vs Ashley Hart / Tyler Sinsabaugh6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Burkwood - Decker Mix 40 9.053141023211
2Deep Run Kelly44131123205
3Belmont - Gregory3591534241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Clara Laing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.60
Patrick Gee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Brian Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
Leslie Altaffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.32
Lauren Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.32
Megan Alwine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
David Lefkowitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Laura Lafors
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.27
Allison Engel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Tom Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.20
Elizabeth Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.17
Todd Prince
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Ryan Baker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Erin Waters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Abigail Dryden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Lauren Jones
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.82
Patrick Gee
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Brian Rowe
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Leslie Altaffer
72W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.42
Lauren Palmer
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Megan Alwine
110W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
4.32
4.5
David Lefkowitz
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Laura Lafors
158W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Allison Engel
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Tom Bryan
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.20
Todd Prince
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.17
Ryan Baker
27W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.16
Erin Waters
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Abigail Dryden
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Lauren Jones
17W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.