Teams

HCC Different Strokes - K. Armagost

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over - Night · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 4.06 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesBrandy Mickey / Jane Maxwell vs Andrea Cammarata / Kim Ortmeier2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGina Morgan / Lita Hollister vs Denise Maqueira / Toni Kitchens7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-03vs Hills/Garlick - HCC Night RidersLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Armagost / Brandy Mickey vs Lindsey Robbins / Alexis Ciesla3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBrandy Mickey vs Leticia Leppert2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDori Hazama / Tiffany Amesbury vs Ida-M Pedersen / Stephane Duroseau4-6, 6-7
2022-02-07vs Hills/Garlick - HCC Night RidersLost 12
W#1 DoublesKlodiana Shehi / Amanda Hammerli vs Alexis Ciesla / Kristine Chunn6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBrandy Mickey vs Olivia Rivas4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJoann Suyao / Lita Hollister vs Tania Biller / Christina Dausch1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBrandy Mickey vs Adeife Marciniak3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Hammerli / Joann Suyao vs Sherri Bornstine / Toni Kitchens4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-17vs Hills/Garlick - HCC Night RidersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrandy Mickey vs Olivia Rivas6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDori Hazama / Lita Hollister vs Lara Slatniske / Tania Biller6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Angie Jones
published 4.5
Jamie Hamilton
published 4.5
4.24
Farheen Aldeen
published 4.5
3.87
Klodiana Shehi
published
3.79
Amanda Hammerli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Kelly Armagost
published
3.66
Joann Suyao
published
3.62
Michelle Meyer
published
3.57
Brandy Mickey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.51
Melissa Voelker
published
3.49
Casey Gates
published 4
3.45
Lita Hollister
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Jane Maxwell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Dori Hazama
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dori Hazama + Brandy Mickey6355% gamesnot enough data
Dori Hazama + Jane Maxwell3246% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Hammerli + Klodiana Shehi4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Jones
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
4.37
4.5
Jamie Hamilton
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Farheen Aldeen
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Klodiana Shehi
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Amanda Hammerli
119W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Joann Suyao
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Michelle Meyer
7W–18L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Brandy Mickey
77W–49L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
Melissa Voelker
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Casey Gates
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Lita Hollister
78W–113L career · 3 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Jane Maxwell
114W–96L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Dori Hazama
199W–167L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.