Teams

BRTC:Bass River:Licari

2026 EMA Adult 55 & Over Men · 8.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-07vs WOB:Locusts Fossils:HastingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Callahan / David Repetto vs Robert Naftoly / Stephen Wiles6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSteven Colby / Michael Elmer vs Matthew Nardone / Randal Noller7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Connor / Erik C Smith vs Alan Kessler / Chris Stanton6-2, 6-4
2026-06-30vs W109 Milstein W109:MilsteinWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Callahan / David Repetto vs Gregg Barnes / Fernando Dias4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Elmer / Steven Colby vs Scott Stephenson / Andrew Tappe6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKevin Greene / Kevin Connor vs Andrzej Niemierko / Ari Milstein3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-23vs NEW:Newburyport:Russell/ LaCroixWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Repetto / David Callahan vs Barry Lacroix / Robert Vedrani6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Connor / Steven Colby vs Eric Russell / Nicholas Schulson6-3, 6-1
2026-06-17vs WIG:Wightman:Lewis/OneliLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Callahan / David Repetto vs John Lewis / Rich Kosowsky6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHenry Risman / Daniel DeLay vs Michael Gagliardi / John Kenney0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErik C Smith / Kevin Connor vs John McGeough / Ciaran O'Neill6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2026-06-11vs WOB:Locusts Fossils:HastingsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Callahan / Leonard Licari vs Alexis Tzannes / Stephen Wiles2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel DeLay / David Repetto vs Matthew Nardone / Randal Noller3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Elmer / Kevin Greene vs Alan Kessler / Martin Spielmann7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-26vs W109 Milstein W109:MilsteinWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Callahan / David Repetto vs Dave Stephenson / Scott Stephenson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeonard Licari / Daniel DeLay vs Gregg Barnes / Fernando Dias3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Connor / Kevin Greene vs Ralph Pinto / Ari Milstein6-1, 7-5
2026-05-19vs NEW:Newburyport:Russell/ LaCroixLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Callahan / David Repetto vs Jamie Chabot / Richard Noyes1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel DeLay / Leonard Licari vs Eric Russell / Nicholas Schulson6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKevin Greene / Robert Benoit vs Barry Lacroix / Scott Kresge4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-05-12vs WIG:Wightman:Lewis/OneliWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Callahan / David Repetto vs Eric Yi / John McGeough6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Elmer / Steven Colby vs Michael Gagliardi / Rich Kosowsky6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLeonard Licari / Daniel DeLay vs Craig Lewis / Ciaran O'Neill6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1W109 Milstein W109:Milstein0816820200
2WOB:Locusts Fossils:Hastings0815923198
3WIG:Wightman:Lewis/Oneli08141024206
4BRTC:Bass River:Licari08131124195
5NEW:Newburyport:Russell/ LaCroix0822246281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Michael Elmer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
David Repetto
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.77
Daniel DeLay
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
David Callahan
published 4
3.71
Henry Risman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Leonard Licari
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Tim Curran
published
3.52
Steven Colby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Erik C Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kevin Connor
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kevin Greene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Benoit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Callahan + David Repetto9166% games+11.7% vs expected
David Callahan + Leonard Licari3544% games−3.1% vs expected
Leonard Licari + David Repetto3548% games−5.0% vs expected
Steven Colby + Michael Elmer7165% gamesnot enough data
Leonard Licari + Kevin Connor4258% gamesnot enough data
Leonard Licari + Daniel DeLay123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Elmer
44W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
David Repetto
127W–41L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Daniel DeLay
114W–85L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
David Callahan
54W–39L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Henry Risman
6W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Leonard Licari
90W–83L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Tim Curran
113W–65L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
Steven Colby
23W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Erik C Smith
60W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Kevin Connor
48W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Greene
35W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Benoit
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.