Teams

Metro: Ramos

2025 18&Over Mixed Manhattan · 10.0 Mixed

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-23vs BindlerWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeticia Nazari Urbina Tejeda / Ernesto Ramos Prom vs Alvaro Hobbs / Audrionna Farr6-0, 6-0
2025-04-11vs Tomasini/GergerLost 02
L#1 DoublesGustavo Loza Padilla / Frederica Piedade vs Ben Shapiro / Priyanka Shah6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRene Ramos Israde / Lena Arafa vs Eric Tomasini / Sarah Bowen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-26vs BindlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesGustavo Loza Padilla / Leticia Nazari Urbina Tejeda vs Sofiya Kuzina / Luis Vivas Martinez1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-19vs Tomasini/GergerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGustavo Loza Padilla / Frederica Piedade vs Sarah Bowen / Samuel Todd7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesErnesto Ramos Prom / Olivia Chin vs James Freeman / Sarah Frendo3-6, 4-6
2025-03-07vs BindlerWon 10
W#1 DoublesGustavo Loza Padilla / Frederica Piedade vs Ruo Chen / Elisa van Meeteren6-1, 7-6
2025-02-27vs Tomasini/GergerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErnesto Ramos Prom / Leticia Nazari Urbina Tejeda vs Jean-Na Koo / James Freeman7-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesGustavo Loza Padilla / Lena Arafa vs Janie Marcus / Payum Payman6-1, 6-3
2025-02-16vs BindlerWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeticia Nazari Urbina Tejeda / Ernesto Ramos Prom vs Ruo Chen / Elisa van Meeteren4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFrederica Piedade / Rene Ramos Israde vs Sofiya Kuzina / Luis Vivas Martinez4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-31vs Tomasini/GergerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFrederica Piedade / Gustavo Loza Padilla vs Hicham Fathi El Idrissi / Ria Gerger6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErnesto Ramos Prom / Leticia Nazari Urbina Tejeda vs Ben Shapiro / Carol Benito3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 10.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Aleksandra Pavlovic
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.31
Lena Arafa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Ernesto Ramos Prom
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Gustavo Loza Padilla
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Ilia Shatashvili
published
Rene Ramos Israde
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aleksandra Pavlovic
19W–7L career · type S · 9 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
Lena Arafa
32W–39L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
4.31
Ernesto Ramos Prom
7W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gustavo Loza Padilla
12W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ilia Shatashvili
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rene Ramos Israde
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.