Teams

GS - Miller

2025 Combo 55 & Over Day League - GS · 7.5 Adult Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-11vs GS - ShannonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynley Newton / Debbie Lincoln vs Mallory Jackson / Cheryl Scarbrough6-1, 6-0
2025-08-04vs GS - ShannonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLynley Newton / Roxanne Bates vs Jo H Phillips / Mallory Jackson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPam Harrison / Aurelia Tucker vs Christie Watford-Shannon / Stephanie Barnett0-6, 3-6
2025-07-28vs GS - ShannonWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Klopman / Anita Norwood vs Mallory Jackson / Jo H Phillips4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynley Newton / Molly Wagner vs Francis Samios / Lisa Ray2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie Lincoln / Donna Russell vs Christie Watford-Shannon / Kim Humphrey6-2, 6-1
2025-07-21vs GS - ShannonWon 21
L#1 DoublesPam Harrison / Joan Fletcher vs Jo H Phillips / Mallory Jackson0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAnita Norwood / Donna Russell vs Suzette Taylor / Barbara Ybarra7-6
W#3 DoublesLynley Newton / Roxanne Bates vs Christie Watford-Shannon / Stephanie Barnett4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-14vs GS - ShannonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynley Newton / Pam Harrison vs Christie Watford-Shannon / Cheryl Scarbrough7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoan Fletcher / Sher Miller vs Mallory Jackson / Christine Slaughter6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMolly Wagner / Donna Russell vs Ann Gaylor / Lisa Ray1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Nancy Klopman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Roxanne Bates
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Aurelia Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Sher Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Anita Norwood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Molly Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Pam Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Debbie Lincoln
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lynley Newton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Klopman
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Roxanne Bates
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Aurelia Tucker
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Sher Miller
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Anita Norwood
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Wagner
29W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Pam Harrison
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Debbie Lincoln
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lynley Newton
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.