Teams

Three's Company

2024 FLEX DYNAMIC DUO · Women 3.5

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-21Won 10
W#2 SinglesRachel Boren vs Kelly Mooney6-3
2024-09-15vs J & JLost 01
L#1 SinglesRachel Boren vs Jenessa Taylor4-6
2024-09-03vs Three AmigasLost 01
L#1 SinglesRachel Boren vs Julianne Arnell1-6
2024-08-28vs Slam SquadWon 10
W#2 SinglesRachel Boren vs Tracie Munds6-2
2024-08-26vs J & JLost 01
L#2 SinglesRachel Boren vs Jessie Vogel5-7
2024-08-20vs Hot FlashesLost 01
L#1 SinglesRachel Boren vs Anna Orrison4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1J & J71195582
2Hot Flashes62168882
3Three's Company53131111104
4Three Amigas166151597
5Slam Squad0731818120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Christy Siemons
published 3.5
3.15
Rachel Boren
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Erin Kohler
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christy Siemons
29W–37L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Rachel Boren
146W–192L career · 6 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Erin Kohler
75W–66L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.