Teams

Da.Berry40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-28vs Me.McCaskill40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Flores / Shannon Clarkson vs Holly Austin / Meredith McCaskill5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-26vs Ke.Nels40ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnn Flores / Shannon Clarkson vs Molly Chaffee / Erin Reis6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeather Caracio / Elizabeth Kirby vs Fran Harris / Lauren Gentile3-6, 2-6
2025-03-29vs Ke.Hurter40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesVeda Bynum / Shannon Marconi vs Kelly Hurter / Angela McGee4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAnn Flores / Heather Caracio vs Rebecca Harris / Meagan Moore6-7, 2-6
2025-03-15vs Te.Yasin40A2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Clarkson / Ann Flores vs Kristina Faulkner / Jeanna Hastie6-2, 6-0
2025-03-08vs An.McNeil40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Caracio / Elizabeth Kirby vs Jana Inman / Miriam Nuffer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-01vs Ke.Nels40ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesShannon Clarkson / Ann Flores vs Kelly Nels / Stephanie Ratliff7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerry Marcott / Heather Caracio vs Carrie Martinelli / Lauren Gentile2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Shannon Clarkson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Dawn Berry
published 2.5
2.59
Shannon Marconi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Lauren Kilpatrick
published
2.45
Heather Caracio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Ann Flores
published 2.5
2.36
Veda Bynum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Elizabeth Kirby
published
2.06
Heather Jones
published
2.00
Terry Marcott
published
1.82
Heidi Doyle
published
Kristine Arora
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Kilpatrick + Dawn Berry10070% games+16.6% vs expected
Heidi Doyle + Elizabeth Kirby123 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Doyle + Heather Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Shannon Clarkson
38W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
2.5
Dawn Berry
22W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
3
Shannon Marconi
46W–46L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Lauren Kilpatrick
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.51
3
Heather Caracio
19W–33L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
2.5
Ann Flores
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Veda Bynum
44W–70L career · 1 line in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Elizabeth Kirby
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Heather Jones
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Terry Marcott
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Heidi Doyle
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Kristine Arora
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.