Teams

Serves You Right (MCC)

2026 Mixed 18 and Over League · 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-12vs It Takes TwoLost 03
L#1 DoublesJustin Prouty / Natalie Plotkin vs Aumnart Akamai Lapus / Shannon Sayles6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJack Grumet / Rachel Kofron vs shar martin / Marcus Richter4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Buechner / Anne Swift vs Justin Simpson / Jill Kanahele1-6, 0-6
2026-04-04vs MCC Mixed MadnessLost 12
W#1 DoublesJustin Prouty / Erin Haywood vs Peter Leander / Sabrina Jardine6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKarla Nutt / Tom Keirnes vs Matson Kelley / Melissa Padillla6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJonathan Yudis / Tesha Newman vs Elizabeth Lofaro / Yeshua Goodman5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-30vs Mike 7.0-4Won 21
L#1 DoublesGina Teliho / James Simmons vs Melanie Devereux / Ricky Tobita4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKarla Nutt / Matthew Buechner vs Susan Bailey / Chris Morakis6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNatalie Plotkin / Jonathan Yudis vs Rachael Barnard / Kelly Tobita4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-29vs Mike 7.0-3Won 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Plotkin / Jack Grumet vs Jan Bryan / Jason Albano6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErin Haywood / Tom Keirnes vs Aleth Sabugo / Aaron Gabuat6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRachel Kofron / Matthew Buechner vs Lynette Zorbas / Rielyn Domingo6-3, 7-6
2026-03-08vs Mike 7.0-1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJack Grumet / Natalie Plotkin vs Efren Villon / Trudi Vierra3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTom Keirnes / Rachel Kofron vs Eugene Uclaray / Pamela Singlehurst-kapisi5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJonathan Yudis / Karla Nutt vs Brendon Velasco / Lore Lee Robello6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-07vs Mike 7.0-2Won 30
W#1 DoublesJonathan Yudis / Anne Swift vs Bruce Coelho / Mina Chaikin2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJack Grumet / Tesha Newman vs Kawika Kiili / Mikayla Lau7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTom Keirnes / Erin Haywood vs Steve Ulene / Darlene Haslam6-0, 6-0
2026-03-01vs Mike 7.0-5Won 21
L#1 DoublesErin Haywood / James Simmons vs Mina Welch / Nicholas Clemons4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKarla Nutt / Tom Keirnes vs Tricia Kezeli / Dave Wagner6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTesha Newman / Jonathan Yudis vs Kandy Grantz / Carl Bertelmann6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCC Mixed Madness6115616158
2Serves You Right (MCC)43111023167
3Mike 7.0-51661532219
4Mike 7.0-40741735236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Tesha Newman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Gina Teliho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Karla Nutt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Jonathan Yudis
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
James Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Erin Haywood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Tom Keirnes
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Natalie Plotkin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Justin Prouty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Rachel Kofron
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Anne Swift
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Fritz Schneider
published
Jack Grumet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Buechner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tesha Newman + Jonathan Yudis9171% games+10.4% vs expected
Jonathan Yudis + Natalie Plotkin224 matchesnot enough data
Gina Teliho + Justin Prouty213 matchesnot enough data
Justin Prouty + Natalie Plotkin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tesha Newman
86W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Gina Teliho
77W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Karla Nutt
102W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Jonathan Yudis
101W–78L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
James Simmons
35W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Erin Haywood
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Tom Keirnes
66W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Natalie Plotkin
19W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Justin Prouty
31W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Rachel Kofron
22W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Anne Swift
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Fritz Schneider
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jack Grumet
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Buechner
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.