Teams

Viera Regional Park - Woods

2025 Brevard Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-11vs RCCB - TattersallWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenny Mullowney / Rob Graney vs Brenda Tarquinio / Rick Tarquinio6-4, 6-1
2025-03-28vs Brevard/Reza/40&Over6.0MXDLost 01
L#3 DoublesJenny Mullowney / Rob Graney vs Dominick Nitti / Caroline Jiborn4-6, 3-6
2025-03-14vs Kiwi - TuccioLost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Cozad / Christopher Blanton vs Julianne Moore / Christopher Moore2-6, 1-6
2025-03-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Mullowney / Jenny Mullowney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-28vs RCCB - TattersallLost 01
L#2 DoublesJenny Mullowney / Mike Mullowney vs Michelle Dunn / Robert Dunn4-6, 3-6
2025-02-22vs Brevard/Reza/40&Over6.0MXDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Rouveyrol / Ellery Canlas vs Sharon Ford / Leonardo Miotti6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKerry Sawyer / Rob Graney vs Chrissy James / Adrian Reza7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLael Woods / Chad Helpling vs Anastasia Mika / Robert DeVries6-2, 7-6
2025-01-31vs EGYC - LoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Cozad / Chad Helpling vs Leslie Love / Craig Tretheway7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Kerry Sawyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Liliana Gutierrez
published
2.88
Chad Helpling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Rob Graney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Ellery Canlas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Cindy Cozad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Laura Rouveyrol
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Jenny Mullowney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Lael Woods
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Nierenberg
published
Ron Rushin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Sawyer + Chad Helpling4258% gamesnot enough data
Ellery Canlas + Kerry Sawyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerry Sawyer
39W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Liliana Gutierrez
16W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Chad Helpling
21W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Rob Graney
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Ellery Canlas
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Cindy Cozad
51W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Laura Rouveyrol
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Jenny Mullowney
62W–83L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Karen Nierenberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ron Rushin
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.