Teams

WHRC-Reis

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.96 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jonathan Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Philip Stephenson
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 4
3.68
Tony Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.68
Eric Peterson
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.65
Scott Reis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.63
Radu Tudorache
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4
3.62
Parth Pandey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Jason Dortch
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.55
Jason Moore-Greenke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Rich Rice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Jack Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Andrew Roessler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jonathan Gonzales
18W–18L career
0%99%1%
3.81
4
Philip Stephenson
43W–42L career
1%98%0%
3.74
4
Tony Moreno
308W–152L career
2%98%0%
3.68
4
Eric Peterson
13W–23L career
7%93%0%
3.68
3.5
Scott Reis
56W–58L career
0%39%61%
3.65
4
Radu Tudorache
39W–34L career
7%93%0%
3.63
4
Parth Pandey
26W–32L career
9%91%0%
3.62
4
Jason Dortch
108W–99L career · type A
19%81%0%
3.55
4
Jason Moore-Greenke
71W–74L career
21%79%0%
3.55
4
Rich Rice
65W–70L career
46%54%0%
3.46
4
Jack Carlson
33W–50L career
61%39%0%
3.40
4
Andrew Roessler
26W–23L career · type A
64%37%0%
3.40

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.