Teams

Kreutzer: South Metro Mixed

2025 Mixed 40 & OVER Summer · 8.0 MX (SUN)

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-27vs HANSEN/KVAM - 40'sWon 30
W#1 DoublesJo Janssens / Lana Pinnock vs Sara DeSanto / Benjamin Colburn6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTony Mosser / Lori Mosser vs Kevin Green / Sarah Speltz7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoel Haggerty / Kara Kreutzer vs Ted Stearns / Tanya Kvam6-4, 6-3
2025-06-15vs HANSEN/KVAM - 40'sLost 01
L#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Kara Kreutzer vs David Komula / Sarah Speltz4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-18vs Kuberski - UNDERDOGS - 8.0 MXD-40sLost 01
L#1 DoublesSam Hobbs / Kara Kreutzer vs Noah Lipschultz / Jennifer Johnson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Neal Gambaiani
published
4.22
Peter Heunisch
published
3.90
Sam Hobbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Kara Kreutzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Lana Pinnock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Tony Mosser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Lori Mosser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Jo Janssens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Gretchen Seifert
published
3.49
Sarah Curfman
published
3.44
Amy Gleason
published 3.5
3.37
Geri Gambucci
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Lisa Proepper
published
Joel Haggerty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karla Toleu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neal Gambaiani + Sarah Curfman4353% games−1.9% vs expected
Lori Mosser + Tony Mosser4843% games−7.4% vs expected
Lana Pinnock + Jo Janssens314 matchesnot enough data
Lori Mosser + Jo Janssens224 matchesnot enough data
Neal Gambaiani + Lisa Proepper033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neal Gambaiani
27W–23L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Peter Heunisch
33W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4
Sam Hobbs
249W–170L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Kara Kreutzer
36W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Lana Pinnock
23W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Tony Mosser
10W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Lori Mosser
18W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Jo Janssens
22W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Gretchen Seifert
19W–24L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Sarah Curfman
58W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Amy Gleason
28W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Geri Gambucci
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Lisa Proepper
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Joel Haggerty
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karla Toleu
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.