Teams

HARBOR PT 18AW5.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 5.0

25 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.41 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.01
Alison Revell
published 5
4.88
Lisa Everest
published
4.77
Wendy Stovell
published
4.77
Debbie Gersten
published 5
Annie Yates
published 5
4.62
Cynthia Bascara
published 5
4.62
Jennifer Azevedo
published
4.61
Janine Schiess
published
4.56
Mary Graber
published
4.40
Michelle Kohm
published
4.37
Julie Silveira
published
4.36
Kristin Morrell
published
4.35
Georgina Goldman
published
4.33
Michelle Gurman
published
4.31
Noa Ramo-Larios
published
4.29
Chandra Thomas
published 4.5
4.26
4.26
Elizabeth Shalev
published
Anna Varnay-Truong
published 4.5
4.23
Ploy Atibaedya-Vien
published
4.23
4.16
Leora Grimshaw
published
4.09
Lindsey Burmeister
published
3.94
Amy See
published 4.5
3.92
Nicole Bianchi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chandra Thomas + Noa Ramo-Larios3346% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alison Revell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
5.01
Lisa Everest
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.88
Wendy Stovell
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Debbie Gersten
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Annie Yates
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Cynthia Bascara
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.62
Jennifer Azevedo
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.62
Janine Schiess
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
Mary Graber
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.56
Michelle Kohm
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
Julie Silveira
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.37
Kristin Morrell
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.36
Georgina Goldman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
4.35
Michelle Gurman
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
Noa Ramo-Larios
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Chandra Thomas
27W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Kimberly Borah-Schulist
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.26
Elizabeth Shalev
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Anna Varnay-Truong
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ploy Atibaedya-Vien
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Christine Costamagna
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Leora Grimshaw
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Lindsey Burmeister
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Amy See
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
Nicole Bianchi
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.