Teams

SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM3.0A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-15vs SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM3.0BLost 01
L#2 DoublesKhalid Beg / Steve Honodel vs YUCHEN HUANG / Xun Ouyang4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKhalid Beg / Steve Honodel vs TERUHIRO TAGOMORI / King Yee6-0, 6-0
2022-06-15vs SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM3.0BLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Honodel / Lawrence Hung vs Peng Xi / YUDI YANG2-6, 2-6
2022-06-10vs SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM3.0CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAustin Conlon / Steve Honodel vs Mahesh Vencata / Gary Tellgren1-6, 4-6
2022-05-14vs SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM3.0BLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Honodel / Khalid Beg vs Jingfan Sun / Yanxin Chen2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Honodel / Khalid Beg vs Johnson Fong / Soonkyun Shin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-12vs BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 18AM3.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesManish Doshi / Steve Honodel vs Michael Gold / Charles Grayson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Sergey Bokovikov
published
3.22
John Kawamoto
published
3.08
Rich Reitman
published
2.94
Nandan Gururaj
published
2.92
Randy Seid
published
2.85
Khalid Beg
published
2.82
Manish Doshi
published
2.67
Rizwan Niazi
published
2.53
Rahul Nimaiyar
published
2.50
Steve Honodel
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Subbu Venkatraman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Manish Doshi + Rizwan Niazi6154% games−7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sergey Bokovikov
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
John Kawamoto
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Rich Reitman
17W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.08
Nandan Gururaj
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Randy Seid
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Khalid Beg
18W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Manish Doshi
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Rizwan Niazi
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Rahul Nimaiyar
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Steve Honodel
27W–32L career · 7 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
Subbu Venkatraman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.