Teams

Eagle Harbor - Petersen

2026 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-22vs PVIC - BenderLost 14
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Bernard / Joan Karlson vs Melissa Dykes / Krystal Hood4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSono Brewer vs Emily Young5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Broyles / Melanie Kissane vs Karen Duncan / Kristin Globell6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLori Gunn / Paulette Petersen vs Tami Bender / Danielle Frey7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesCHRISTINA MASON / Mary Michaels vs Debbie Davis / Elizabeth Lowe6-3, 6-4
2026-03-08vs Glen Kernan - AlexanderWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaria Broyles / Alice Coats vs Kim Alexander / Susan Day1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaulette Petersen / Mary Michaels vs Victoria Gomez / Laura Nolan7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCHRISTINA MASON / Lori Gunn vs Sally Flynn / Alison Kusch7-5, 7-5
2026-02-28vs Sawgrass - ConlinLost 04
L#1 DoublesCHRISTINA MASON / Brenda Campbell vs Stacey Mayer / Lauren Stroker0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Broyles / Melanie Kissane vs Betsy Delcour / Melissa Knarr1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Bernard / Joan Karlson vs Susan Conlin / Tulin Lopez0-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesAlice Coats / Lori Gunn vs Kathleen Allen / Jennifer Brady3-6, 3-6
2026-02-15vs Williams Y - TownsendLost 01
L#1 DoublesHarriet Shaughnessy / Kerry Reardon vs Christie Morse / Natalia Mendoza0-6, 1-6
2026-02-08vs Jax Golf - HealeyLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlice Coats / Kerry Reardon vs Catherine Evans / Heather Olson6-7, 6-7
2026-01-25vs Duval/WolfelLost 05
L#1 DoublesJoan Karlson / Jacqueline Bernard vs Maria Quiros / Jaime Eaton2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPaulette Petersen vs Bridget Wolfel1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Broyles / Christy Surgeoner vs Ana Carter / CATHERINE SCHAEFER1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLori Gunn / Alice Coats vs Heather Weidle / Amy Newbern2-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesMary Michaels / Sono Brewer vs Melanie Stimler / An Oskarsson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-01-11vs Yards - CordellLost 05
L#1 DoublesJoan Karlson / Jacqueline Bernard vs Elizabeth McKillop / Kristina Powell3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSono Brewer vs Melinda Marchesi1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlice Coats / Mary Michaels vs Kia Linebaugh / Jennifer Ream1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaulette Petersen / Brenda Campbell vs Jamie Lewis / Lori Cordell0-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesCHRISTINA MASON / Lori Gunn vs Debra Tewey / Vanya Robinson1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Maria Broyles
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Amy Shappell
published 3
Christy Surgeoner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Lori Gunn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Mary Michaels
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Sono Brewer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Alice Coats
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.48
Jacqueline Bernard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Joan Karlson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.46
Paulette Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Brenda Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.24
CHRISTINA MASON
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Kerry Reardon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melanie Kissane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Schnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Bernard + Joan Karlson0628% games−11.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Broyles
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Amy Shappell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Christy Surgeoner
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lori Gunn
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
Mary Michaels
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Sono Brewer
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
Alice Coats
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Jacqueline Bernard
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Joan Karlson
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Paulette Petersen
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46
2.5
Brenda Campbell
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
CHRISTINA MASON
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Kerry Reardon
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Kissane
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Schnell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.