Teams

Pinellas/Gross/18&Over3.5W

2023 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 W Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 3.59 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-25vs Seminole Lake KelseyWon 30
W#2 DoublesDori Hazama / Gina Morgan vs Kristen Pierce / Elise Gilbert7-5, 7-6
W#2 SinglesTamara Tindell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKimberly Northup / Deborah Larsen vs Pauline Deal / Katie Dionne6-4, 7-5
2023-03-18vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesGina Morgan / Dori Hazama vs Kenzier McIntyre / Samantha Romasiewicz7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill MacNeil / Trisha Shirkey vs Kim Williams / Esthela Gonzalez7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnne Remie / Harriet Cregann vs Denise White / Diane Haymes6-3, 6-4
2023-03-11vs Seminole Lake KelseySplit 11
L#1 DoublesGina Morgan / Dori Hazama vs Rachel Karioki / Julia Pierce2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJill MacNeil / Trisha Shirkey vs Sue Francis / Lina Chaves6-1, 6-0
2023-03-04vs Belleair Del BassoWon 20
W#1 DoublesGina Morgan / Dori Hazama vs Yve Feinberg / Lori Emery6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Northup / Trisha Shirkey vs Karen Fischer / Jill Rende7-5, 6-1
2023-02-25vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Won 31
L#1 DoublesGina Morgan / Dori Hazama vs Kenzier McIntyre / Samantha Romasiewicz6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Remie / Harriet Cregann vs Kymberlee Olson / Roxanne Ross6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Juliet Auer6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTrisha Shirkey / Christine Campbell vs Kim Williams / Deborah Bianchi6-4, 6-4
2023-02-18vs Seminole Lake KelseyWon 21
W#1 DoublesHarriet Cregann / Anne Remie vs Rachel Karioki / Carol Vitelli6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Jennifer Botelho6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDanielle Haggar / Trisha Shirkey vs Terry Kelsey / Julia Pierce1-6, 5-7
2023-02-11vs Belleair Del BassoLost 03
L#1 SinglesAnne Remie vs Madalyn Jordan5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Larsen / Dori Hazama vs Yve Feinberg / Karen Koch2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Northup / Jackie Detrick vs Louise Del Basso / Susan Evans6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-01-28vs Belleair Del BassoLost 02
L#2 DoublesCarrie Kilgroe / Cindy Ferguson vs Madalyn Jordan / Cambria Whalen1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Stacey Reznicek4-6, 1-6
2023-01-14vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Won 40
W#1 DoublesGina Morgan / Dori Hazama vs Kymberlee Olson / Alicia Ault6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Ava Leischen6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Remie / Harriet Cregann vs Kenzier McIntyre / Deborah Bianchi6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDanielle Haggar / Trisha Shirkey vs Danielle Coke / Diane Haymes6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.56
Harriet Cregann
published 4
3.46
Kimberly Northup
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Tamara Tindell
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Carrie Kilgroe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Trisha Shirkey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Deborah Larsen
published 3.5
3.29
Anne Remie
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Cindy Ferguson
published 3.5
3.25
Maribel Gross
published
3.25
Dori Hazama
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Danielle Haggar
published 3.5
3.22
Christine Campbell
published 3.5
3.20
Jill MacNeil
published
3.13
Sally Blush
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Kilgroe + Trisha Shirkey5262% games+10.6% vs expected
Danielle Haggar + Tamara Tindell4160% games−2.0% vs expected
Dori Hazama + Trisha Shirkey4349% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Northup + Trisha Shirkey4255% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Northup + Tamara Tindell134 matchesnot enough data
Maribel Gross + Anne Remie123 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Northup + Dori Hazama303 matchesnot enough data
Trisha Shirkey + Anne Remie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Harriet Cregann
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Kimberly Northup
66W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Tamara Tindell
97W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Carrie Kilgroe
61W–36L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Trisha Shirkey
138W–83L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Deborah Larsen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Anne Remie
136W–73L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Cindy Ferguson
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maribel Gross
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Dori Hazama
199W–167L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Danielle Haggar
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Christine Campbell
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Jill MacNeil
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Sally Blush
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.