Teams

Al.Sheehan18T

2024 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-23vs As.Walton18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesAllison Sheehan / Lisa Gwyn vs LUCY LAV / Tracey Carlin1-6, 3-6
2024-07-16vs Ch.Higgins18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Glenn / Melanie Tharrington vs Caroline Fungaroli / Diane Sauer6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-07-09vs Ka.Wakeford18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Matthews / Lisa Gwyn vs Cristina Ennis / Martha Funsten6-0, 6-3
2024-07-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelanie Tharrington / Allison Sheehan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-11vs Ki.Johnson18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelanie Tharrington / Martha Sanders vs Amy Merdes / Kim Johnson6-4, 6-1
2024-06-04vs Ka.Wakeford18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Gwyn / Elizabeth Matthews vs Karen Wakeford / Martha Funsten6-4, 6-1
2024-05-28vs Na.Norris18T3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Sheehan / Melanie Tharrington vs Amy Cagle / Sherrie Smith6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Ashley Vaughan
published 4
3.86
Elisabeth Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Martha Sanders
published
3.36
Melanie Tharrington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Allison Sheehan
published 3.5
3.30
Allison Glenn
published 3.5
3.29
Lisa Gwyn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Christina Allen
published 3.5
3.04
Amy Baker
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Glenn + Allison Sheehan4347% games+1.9% vs expected
Lisa Gwyn + Melanie Tharrington4745% gamesnot enough data
Elisabeth Sanchez + Melanie Tharrington5547% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Gwyn + Elisabeth Sanchez123 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Tharrington + Allison Sheehan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Vaughan
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Elisabeth Sanchez
101W–117L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
Martha Sanders
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Melanie Tharrington
86W–90L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Allison Sheehan
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Allison Glenn
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Lisa Gwyn
58W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Christina Allen
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Amy Baker
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.