← Teams

SHC-Christensen/Vedder

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.55 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Mary Hlady
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.39
Chris van Leeuwen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Ruth Semon
published 3.5
3.32
Tami Socolofsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Patricia Eargle
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
—
Katherine Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Nicole Vedder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Paula Watt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Kim Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Melanie DeSilva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-11-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Robin Welter vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Kelly Norling6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Christensen / Tami Socolofsky vs Blythe Knott / Wendy Weddle3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Patricia Eargle vs Colleen Walker / Kathy Cooke6-3, 6-4
2024-11-17Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRobin Welter / Melanie DeSilva vs Shirley Derby / Julie Arness6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKim Christensen / Tami Socolofsky vs Linda Underwood / Patricia Morrison6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Paula Watt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Robin Welter vs Rochelle Pluymers / Karen Pickering6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicole Vedder / Betty Trubo vs Kelley Gaylor / Lorna Goth6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Patricia Eargle vs Janet Mills / Lynne Nieda6-4, 7-5
2024-11-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Paula Watt vs Lisa Schaller / Robin Collins6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Mary Hlady vs Sue Griffith / Peg McClendon6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Christensen / Tami Socolofsky vs Anne Milan / Michele Desmarais6-3, 6-3
2024-10-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKatherine Farrell / Nicole Vedder vs Lynn Moore / Nancy Collins6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMary Hlady / Melanie DeSilva vs Wendy Nakatani / Cara Williams7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Welter / Patricia Eargle vs Parul Saxena / Patty Chen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-09-28Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBrooke Thompson / Paula Watt vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Traci Laurent6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Nicole Vedder vs Kelly Norling / Susan Hope4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Jacqui Slominski vs Kathy Cooke / Lori Vranizan6-0, 6-2
2024-09-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKatherine Farrell / Brooke Thompson vs Karen McNairy / Saki Newman6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Mary Hlady vs Kimberly Lanier / Molly Taylor5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Tami Socolofsky vs Jan Koenig / Jing Li4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Katherine Farrell vs Dayna Porter / Rochelle Pluymers6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMary Hlady / Melanie DeSilva vs Julie Gorecki / Kelley Gaylor7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRobin Welter / Patricia Eargle vs Janet Mills / Trylla Lembke6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mary Hlady
99W–109L career
34%66%0%
3.50
3.5
Chris van Leeuwen
90W–38L career
0%93%7%
3.39
3.5
Ruth Semon
51W–32L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3.5
Tami Socolofsky
31W–36L career
2%92%6%
3.32
3.5
Patricia Eargle
64W–51L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Katherine Farrell
43W–32L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Nicole Vedder
32W–37L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Paula Watt
43W–47L career
15%82%2%
3.17
3.5
Kim Christensen
41W–43L career
17%82%1%
3.13
3.5
Melanie DeSilva
46W–38L career · type A
10%90%0%
3.12

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.