← Teams

Baseliners

2023 Montgomery Singles Summer · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-28vs Ace TeamLost 0–2
L#1 SinglesDebra MacDonald vs Zoie Acadia1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs Sandy Thongphok4-6, 6-7
2023-08-23vs New HomiesLost 0–1
L#3 SinglesDebra MacDonald vs Hannah Yoo0-6, 4-6
2023-08-17Lost 0–1
L#3 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs Micki Khademi0-6, 4-6
2023-08-13vs Ace TeamSplit 1–1
W#2 SinglesDebra MacDonald vs Colleen ONeil4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs Na Yi1-6, 0-6
2023-08-08vs New HomiesLost 0–2
L#2 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Carmen Scurato0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs Hannah Yoo6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-08-05vs Cosmic Strings SLost 0–3
L#1 SinglesDebra MacDonald vs Jilan Chen2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Jothi Nedungadi5-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs Sandra Murcia4-6, 3-6
2023-07-24vs Ace TeamLost 0–2
L#2 SinglesJennie Kim vs Colleen ONeil1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Na Yi3-6, 3-6
2023-07-11vs Cosmic Strings SLost 0–2
L#1 SinglesJennie Kim vs Katya Vert-Wong0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Meglyn Lansing4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Jennie Kim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Yvette Fontenot
published —
3.14
Debra MacDonald
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Tamar Henkin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.90
Robin Rudowitz
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennie Kim
265W–126L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
—
Yvette Fontenot
17W–26L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Debra MacDonald
213W–223L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Tamar Henkin
116W–147L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Robin Rudowitz
25W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.