Teams

MARIN TC CM7.5A

2023 COMBO · Men 7.5

25 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Christopher Brawer
published 4.5
3.98
Kushal Chakrabarty
published
3.91
3.90
Matthew Littrell
published
3.78
Robert Ahearn
published
Doug van Gessel
published 4
3.67
Jason Holmes
published
3.62
Tassos Papadimos
published
3.49
Vladimir Matyurin
published
3.46
Elliott Magnuson
published 3.5
3.44
Steve Juliani
published
3.41
Jeff Loebbaka
published
3.38
Joseph Gil
published
3.35
Doke Kim
published 3.5
3.34
Jody Osterweil
published
3.31
David Shepard
published 3.5
3.28
Monte Zweben
published
3.27
Mark Clem
published
3.24
Christopher Horne
published 3.5
3.23
Jeffrey Kent
published
3.22
Gervais Tompkin
published 3.5
3.18
Stacy Nimmo
published
3.16
Rob Cochran
published
3.09
Andrew Fremier
published 3.5
Michael Swezy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elliott Magnuson + Jeff Loebbaka3356% gamesnot enough data
Robert Ahearn + Michael Lustenberger044 matchesnot enough data
Elliott Magnuson + Mark Clem213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Brawer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
Kushal Chakrabarty
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.98
Michael Lustenberger
18W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
Matthew Littrell
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Robert Ahearn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Doug van Gessel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Tassos Papadimos
12W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.62
Vladimir Matyurin
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Elliott Magnuson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Steve Juliani
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Jeff Loebbaka
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
Joseph Gil
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Doke Kim
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Jody Osterweil
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
David Shepard
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
Monte Zweben
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Mark Clem
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Christopher Horne
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Jeffrey Kent
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Gervais Tompkin
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Stacy Nimmo
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Rob Cochran
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Andrew Fremier
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
Michael Swezy
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.