Teams

WCC - Browning

2026 Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekday · Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekday 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-20vs Humerick - Bubble TroubleWon 30
W#1 SinglesAdelaide Turnbull vs Kelly Fedorchak6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAlison Brandt vs Brittany Wiles6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSarah Browning vs Stefanie Benson6-3, 6-3
2026-03-10vs Hunsicker - Rally CatsWon 21
L#1 SinglesJulia Connell vs Emily Allen6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAlison Brandt vs Sarah Midgley7-6, 6-4
W#3 SinglesEmily Reardon Burke vs Jane Kim6-1, 6-2
2026-02-24vs Hunsicker - Rally CatsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAdelaide Turnbull vs Courtney Brown7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMary Lou Daylor vs Sarah Midgley6-1, 6-0
2026-02-17vs Humerick - Bubble TroubleWon 21
W#1 SinglesAdelaide Turnbull vs Tricia Hodnett6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEmily Reardon Burke vs Natalia Simek6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesJanet Flaherty vs Lola Ogbonlowo6-0, 6-0
2026-02-12vs Humerick - Bubble TroubleWon 20
W#1 SinglesAdelaide Turnbull vs Madison Humerick7-5, 4-2
W#2 SinglesJanet Flaherty vs Casey Briglia6-4, 6-3
2026-02-10Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMary Lou Daylor vs Courtney Brown2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesEmily Reardon Burke vs Emily Allen6-7, 1-3
2026-01-13vs Hunsicker - Rally CatsLost 12
L#1 SinglesMary Lou Daylor vs Emily Allen1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJulia Connell vs Stephanie Settle5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesSarah Browning vs Jane Kim6-3, 6-1
2026-01-09vs Humerick - Bubble TroubleWon 21
L#1 SinglesAlison Brandt vs Kelly Fedorchak5-7, 5-6
W#2 SinglesJulia Connell vs Carthina Marple6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJanet Flaherty vs Kristin DeMasi6-4, 2-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekday 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hunsicker - Rally Cats7117719188
2WCC - Browning53131121181
3Humerick - Bubble Trouble0861838255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Mary Lou Daylor
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
3.02
Adelaide Turnbull
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3
2.85
Sarah Browning
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Alison Brandt
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.80
Julia Connell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.61
Janet Flaherty
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.59
Emily Reardon Burke
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Lou Daylor
44W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Adelaide Turnbull
9W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Sarah Browning
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Alison Brandt
40W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Julia Connell
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Janet Flaherty
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
2.5
Emily Reardon Burke
2W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.