Teams

Utah/Afualo/ITAMixed7.5

2025 ITA Mixed 18 & Over · 7.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.92 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-06vs Hot HittersWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatherine Yokoyama / Nicholas Hoy vs Jutien Page / Jon Conner6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaricel Renigen / Coby Stump vs Nancy Drabicki / Duane Friedlund6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarl Neve / Brooke Anderson vs Logan Wrigley / Janelle Horton4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-05vs Hot HittersWon 30
W#1 DoublesCoby Stump / Katherine Yokoyama vs Nancy Drabicki / Shangke Zhang6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarl Neve / Brooke Anderson vs mike amelang / Janelle Horton6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTaylor Heinz / Danielle Sorenson vs Logan Wrigley / Camille Jennings6-3, 6-1
2025-09-05vs Hot HittersWon 20
W#1 DoublesUi Afualo / Nicholas Hoy vs Mike Wittwer / Kandace Wittwer7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarl Neve / Brooke Anderson vs Logan Wrigley / Camille Jennings4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-04vs Hot HittersWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaricel Renigen / Nicholas Hoy vs Shangke Zhang / Jutien Page6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCoby Stump / Ui Afualo vs Kandace Wittwer / Mike Wittwer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTaylor Heinz / Danielle Sorenson vs Nancy Drabicki / mike amelang6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Utah/Afualo/ITAMixed7.540120261
2Hot Hitters0401224145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Coby Stump
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.96
Katherine Yokoyama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Ui Afualo
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.77
Maricel Renigen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Carl Neve
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Danielle Sorenson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Nicholas Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ui Afualo + Coby Stump4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Coby Stump
20W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Katherine Yokoyama
148W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Ui Afualo
155W–149L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Maricel Renigen
51W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Carl Neve
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Danielle Sorenson
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas Hoy
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.