Teams

LCTA55/Viljac/MPRD

55 & Over · 55 & Over 9.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-18vs BBTL55/Ravens/Rose Hill TLCLost 03
L#1 DoublesWalt Weekley / Richard Owens vs Michael Mitchell / Thomas McEvoy3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrent Michael / Will Smith vs Robert Tillison / John Brittis4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDaniel Strickland / Troy Marguglio vs Stephen Nitz / Robert Cobb3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-18vs BBTL55/Stone/DatawLost 12
W#1 DoublesHarvey Hines / Troy Marguglio vs Bill Higgs / Brent Borchert6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Viljac / Robert Russell vs Todd Stone / John McSween6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Strickland / Richard Owens vs Kevin McGuire / David Holland2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-17vs LLAS UPTA55A/Kim/SportsclubWon 21
W#1 DoublesHarvey Hines / Walt Weekley vs Joo Ho Kim / Brian Laufenberg7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrent Michael / Daniel Strickland vs Brian Okraska / Kevin Hall0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Viljac / Robert Russell vs Steve Miller / Daryl Tracey6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 9.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Harvey Hines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Michael Viljac
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.23
Monty Shealy
published
4.22
Walt Weekley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Richard Owens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.17
Daniel Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Craig Mitchum
published 4.5
3.89
Robert Russell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Brent Michael
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.76
Frank Pettersen
published 4
Troy Marguglio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Will Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Owens + Monty Shealy9263% games+8.9% vs expected
Frank Pettersen + Michael Viljac3348% games−2.9% vs expected
Michael Viljac + Monty Shealy3348% games−4.1% vs expected
Daniel Strickland + Walt Weekley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Harvey Hines
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.40
Michael Viljac
29W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Monty Shealy
39W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Walt Weekley
27W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
4.22
Richard Owens
26W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Daniel Strickland
43W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Craig Mitchum
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.08
Robert Russell
39W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.89
4.5
Brent Michael
14W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.81
4
Frank Pettersen
77W–52L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
Troy Marguglio
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Will Smith
2W–28L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.