Teams

C.George 40+

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-02vs K.RoseSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJill Cramer / Lee Anne Oxford vs Amy Ellis / Catherine Chavez6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Josette Huntress6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Jennifer Martin6-1, 6-2
2023-04-17vs D.MICHAUDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Cramer / Lee Anne Oxford vs Carol Zimmerman / Lisa Dooley6-1, 6-2
2023-04-11vs J.TunWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Kelly Zargo6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCatherine George / Lee Anne Oxford vs Jennifer Tun / Amber Bruner6-2, 6-3
2023-03-21vs H.PflaumSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Rizzo / Lee Anne Oxford vs Candice Kish / Stacy Grose3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs LaDonna Lee6-4, 6-3
2023-03-14vs J.Copeland 40+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Cramer / Lee Anne Oxford vs Britt Tolliver / Tiffany Thompson4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Lee Anne Oxford
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
2.84
Dana Aderhold
published 3
2.77
Catherine George
published 3
2.77
Ann Garey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Janis McLaughlin
published
Leigh Stallings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inma Navarro Galisteo + Lee Anne Oxford5073% games+11.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lee Anne Oxford
82W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Inma Navarro Galisteo
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Dana Aderhold
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Catherine George
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Ann Garey
94W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Janis McLaughlin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Leigh Stallings
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.