Teams

MARION/McLaughlin

2022 Marion Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-25vs FK - CentonzeWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Grosshans / Shon Murray vs John Pritchard / Charles Lakatos6-3, 6-3
2022-07-24vs FK - CentonzeWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Mcmichael / Isaac Vergara vs Joel Yap / Jeff Zysek6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPeter Grosshans / Shon Murray vs Sridhar Sagili / Kevin Kintzele6-4, 7-6
2022-07-16vs FK - CentonzeWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Grosshans / Paul Steinberg vs Ryan Paul / Jeff Zysek6-4, 6-4
2022-06-27vs FK - CentonzeSplit 11
L#2 SinglesPeter Grosshans vs Andres Trias Labellarte6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGlen Gandiongco / Adalberto Lozano vs Michael Basbano / Gary Greer6-4, 6-3
2022-06-25vs FK - CentonzeLost 02
L#1 DoublesGlen Gandiongco / Danny York vs Alex Dorsey / Kevin Laird1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPeter Grosshans vs Andres Trias Labellarte3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-17vs FK - CentonzeWon 10
W#3 DoublesIsaac Vergara / John Mcmichael vs Jeff Zysek / Ryan Paul3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-11vs FK - CentonzeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGlen Gandiongco / Ralf Barckhausen vs Fernando Mercado-Cruz / Jon Miller2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanny York / John Mcmichael vs John Pritchard / Charles Lakatos5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Peter Grosshans
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.44
Dillon Lagano
published 3.5
3.16
Glen Gandiongco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Isaac Vergara
published 3.5
3.06
Danny York
published 3.5
John Mcmichael
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Nitin Bala
published
Shon Murray
published
Weston Wise
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glen Gandiongco + Peter Grosshans123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Peter Grosshans
148W–115L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Dillon Lagano
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Glen Gandiongco
123W–124L career · 6 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Isaac Vergara
3W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Danny York
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
John Mcmichael
75W–35L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nitin Bala
33W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shon Murray
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Weston Wise
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.