Teams

Not Our Fault

2026 ESL Fall 18&over League · 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-11-13vs LobstersWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Julie Ganter vs Kimberly Greenlee / Enaas Hamed6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachael Weber / Cindy Watts vs Courtney Wallace / Moira Parham6-4, 6-1
2025-11-06vs Serve-ezasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Cindy Watts vs Jaclyn Burroughs / Cydney Clark6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacey Steiner / Kim Weeks vs Jayme Phillips / Angela Fry1-6, 2-6
2025-10-30vs Team Beast- Lady BeastSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Watts / Sheila Rolen-Pender vs Jennifer Hughes / Kellye Cook7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Kim Weeks vs Noeen Sarfraz / Andrea Baker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-16vs Team Beast- Lady BeastWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Cindy Watts vs Noeen Sarfraz / Andrea Baker6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSheila Rolen-Pender vs Kellye Cook4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-09vs Ball Too WellLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Julie Ganter vs Bailey Bright / Aprill Shockley6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStacey Steiner vs Lindsay Riddel2-6, 0-6
2025-10-02vs LobstersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSheila Rolen-Pender / Cindy Watts vs Kimberly Stout / Katharine Regens4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Julie Ganter vs Enaas Hamed / Marissa Smith6-1, 6-2
2025-09-25vs NA/Cline and Beaver/Net ProfitsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Ganter / Sheila Rolen-Pender vs Theresa Houser / Anna Hibbard1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStacey Steiner / Jennifer Grantham vs Shannon Purnell / Alisa Ratzlaff2-6, 1-6
2025-09-18vs Serve-ezasLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Rachael Weber vs Jaclyn Burroughs / Jayme Phillips7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSheila Rolen-Pender vs Sarah Laplante1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-11vs NA/Net NerdsLost 02
L#1 DoublesRachael Weber / Julie Ganter vs Julie Ann Ward / Carrie Vanhoose2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Stacey Steiner vs Amber Browning / Alex McDougal2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Cindy Watts vs Layne Grady / Laura Klier6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.31
Julie Ganter
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.31
Emily Shanbour
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
2.22
Sheila Rolen-Pender
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.21
Cindy Watts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.84
Stacey Steiner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Jennifer Grantham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheila Rolen-Pender + Cindy Watts3255% games+10.6% vs expected
Emily Shanbour + Julie Ganter71046% games−1.1% vs expected
Emily Shanbour + Cindy Watts3247% games−5.8% vs expected
Julie Ganter + Cindy Watts033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Ganter
20W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Emily Shanbour
35W–52L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Sheila Rolen-Pender
11W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Cindy Watts
11W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Stacey Steiner
0W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Jennifer Grantham
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.