Teams

HCC Aces of Grace - E. Baldwin

2026 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.43 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-07vs Florida/Roset/55&over9.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa King / Karen Olson vs Melissa Glasgow / Michele Ironsmith0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Baldwin / Rebecca Evangelista vs Anh Thu Miller / Katie Healy6-4, 6-1
2026-02-28vs Florida/Roset/55&over9.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa King / Pollyanna Clark vs Michele Ironsmith / Stephanie Wager3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGail Gibson / Tammy Giaimo vs Dianne Albina / Margaret Roset3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKim Cashman-King / Karen Olson vs Andria Owen / Lisa Haidermota6-1, 7-6
2026-02-21vs Florida/Roset/55&over9.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa King / Karen Olson vs Stephanie Wager / Michele Ironsmith1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Agnew / Kim Cashman-King vs Melissa Glasgow / Margaret Roset6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Evangelista / Gail Gibson vs Anh Thu Miller / Joan Simmons6-2, 6-1
2026-02-07vs Florida/Roset/55&over9.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Baldwin / Elizabeth Burdick vs Dianne Albina / Joan Simmons4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Lyons / Melissa King vs Andria Owen / Lisa Haidermota1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Agnew / Kim Cashman-King vs Stephanie Wager / Michele Ironsmith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-01vs Florida/Roset/55&over9.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Cashman-King / Denise Agnew vs Dianne Albina / Margaret Roset4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGail Gibson / Tammy Giaimo vs Michele Ironsmith / Anh Thu Miller6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Kim Pennington vs Katie Healy / Joan Simmons7-5, 6-4
2026-01-17vs Florida/Roset/55&over9.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesGail Gibson / Elizabeth Burdick vs Lisa Haidermota / Joan Simmons7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Lyons / Kim Cashman-King vs Dianne Albina / Margaret Roset5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Baldwin / Rebecca Evangelista vs Michele Ironsmith / Melissa Glasgow7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Gail Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.65
Elizabeth Baldwin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.38
Lori Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
Denise Agnew
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Kim Cashman-King
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.24
Kim Pennington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Pollyanna Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Melissa King
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Amy Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Rebecca Evangelista
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Tammy Giaimo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Elizabeth Burdick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Gonzalez + Denise Agnew303 matchesnot enough data
Denise Agnew + Kim Cashman-King213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Gail Gibson
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
4.78
5
Elizabeth Baldwin
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
4.65
Lori Gonzalez
128W–78L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Denise Agnew
97W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.38
Kim Cashman-King
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.29
Kim Pennington
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
4.24
Pollyanna Clark
25W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
Melissa King
74W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.06
4.5
Amy Lyons
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Rebecca Evangelista
113W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Tammy Giaimo
60W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Elizabeth Burdick
222W–79L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.