Teams

MCTA55/Lin/USCL

Mixed Doubles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Mixed - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-18vs MCTA 3.5M 55 & Over (Rawdon)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesChin Lin / AMY SAFIR vs Ronnie Rawdon / Tisa Mullis6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoseph Blocksom / Sally Davidson vs Jonathan Hurd / Barbara Rawdon3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Ranadive / Allen Ramsey vs Donna Musante / Stephen Polacek2-6, 2-6
2026-07-11vs MCTA 3.5M 55 & Over (Rawdon)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJoseph Blocksom / Sally Davidson vs Jay Hanna / Donna Musante5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChin Lin / Tamara Gallagher vs Karen Morgan / Cameron Jones6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-11vs MCTA 3.5M 55 & Over (Rawdon)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChin Lin / Tamara Gallagher vs Rae Lynn Pope / Stephen Polacek7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWendy Ranadive / Eric O'Brien vs Jonathan Hurd / Kelley Morabito1-6, 2-6
2026-06-20vs MCTA 3.5M 55 & Over (Rawdon)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEric O'Brien / Wendy Ranadive vs Ronnie Rawdon / Paula Donoghue5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Blocksom / Sally Davidson vs Todd Kasler / Barbara Rawdon6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCyndie Hobson / Joseph Dichak vs Karen Morgan / Cameron Jones7-5, 7-5
2026-06-13vs MCTA 3.5M 55 & Over (Rawdon)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCyndie Hobson / Allen Ramsey vs Todd Kasler / Tisa Mullis2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChin Lin / Janice Daniel vs Jay Hanna / Rae Lynn Pope3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Blocksom / Tamara Gallagher vs Jonathan Hurd / Deborah Lung6-4, 6-2
2026-06-06vs MCTA 3.5M 55 & Over (Rawdon)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChin Lin / Janice Daniel vs Jonathan Hurd / Kelley Morabito4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Blocksom / Sally Davidson vs Ronnie Rawdon / Donna Musante6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Dichak / Wendy Ranadive vs Stephen Polacek / Barbara Rawdon6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-05vs MCTA 3.5M 55 & Over (Rawdon)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAMY SAFIR / Joseph Dichak vs Deborah Lung / Cameron Jones6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJoseph Blocksom / Sally Davidson vs Karen Morgan / Jay Hanna6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChin Lin / Tamara Gallagher vs Paula Donoghue / Ronnie Rawdon6-0, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Mixed - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCTA 3.5M 55 & Over (Rawdon)7017415174
2MCTA55/Lin/USCL0741734214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Chin Lin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Joseph Blocksom
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.46
AMY SAFIR
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Claude Underwood
published 3.5
3.42
Tamara Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Kelley Montroy
published 3.5
3.37
Joseph Dichak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Wendy Ranadive
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Cyndie Hobson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Janice Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Sally Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Eric O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Allen Ramsey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Davidson + Joseph Blocksom4853% games+2.1% vs expected
Cyndie Hobson + Allen Ramsey3446% games−10.1% vs expected
Cyndie Hobson + Joseph Dichak314 matchesnot enough data
Cyndie Hobson + Chin Lin404 matchesnot enough data
Tamara Gallagher + Chin Lin044 matchesnot enough data
Cyndie Hobson + Joseph Blocksom123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chin Lin
51W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Joseph Blocksom
112W–82L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
AMY SAFIR
190W–92L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Claude Underwood
67W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Tamara Gallagher
245W–148L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Kelley Montroy
136W–99L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Joseph Dichak
138W–146L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Wendy Ranadive
43W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Cyndie Hobson
219W–123L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Janice Daniel
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Sally Davidson
18W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
Eric O'Brien
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Allen Ramsey
16W–23L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.