Teams

NEGTA/Gloria Parr

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Mell / Heide Rudnick vs Ashley Rentz / Lynn Odum6-7, 0-6
2024-11-04vs CCC-CauseySplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnn Mell / Lesley Melson vs Mary Casper / Dancy Wynne2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLinde Leggett / Heide Rudnick vs Sherry Dubose / Terri Smiley6-2, 6-3
2024-10-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLesley Melson / Linde Leggett vs Ashley Rentz / Lynn Odum3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Martha Darby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Janeen Mangan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Linde Leggett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Heide Rudnick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Nancy Gravitt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Phyllis Case
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Karen Konsowitz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Lesley Melson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Vickie Sexton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Patsy Greer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Ann Mell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Gloria Parr
published
2.95
Carmen Hermes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Alison Lamay
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Gravitt + Ann Mell5069% games+6.1% vs expected
Alison Lamay + Carmen Hermes6850% games+5.9% vs expected
Alison Lamay + Martha Darby5352% games+3.0% vs expected
Lesley Melson + Martha Darby8755% games+2.5% vs expected
Ann Mell + Patsy Greer17659% games+1.2% vs expected
Patsy Greer + Karen Konsowitz4252% games+0.9% vs expected
Gloria Parr + Karen Konsowitz2549% games+0.6% vs expected
Gloria Parr + Linde Leggett14556% games+0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Darby
65W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.45
Janeen Mangan
64W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Linde Leggett
58W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
Heide Rudnick
32W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Nancy Gravitt
58W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
Phyllis Case
37W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Karen Konsowitz
64W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Lesley Melson
34W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.21
Vickie Sexton
12W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Patsy Greer
105W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Ann Mell
37W–13L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Gloria Parr
100W–49L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Carmen Hermes
40W–49L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Alison Lamay
21W–35L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.