Teams

Cane 18/BREC

2022 BR Adult 18 & Over - Men · 4.0 BR (18&O) Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.38 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 BR (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carter Crutti
published 5
4.35
Christopher Russo
published 4.5
4.12
4.08
Jon Eenigenburg
published
3.82
Teche Melancon
published
3.82
Stephen Swiber
published
3.55
Mark Christopher
published
Cade Bogan
published 3.5
Justin Andras
published
Michael Cane
published
Timothy Kwan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Andras + Stephen Swiber033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Christopher + Teche Melancon033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Christopher + Stephen Swiber303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carter Crutti
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Russo
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Christopher Fitzgerald
17W–20L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
4.12
Jon Eenigenburg
49W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
4.08
Teche Melancon
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Stephen Swiber
23W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Mark Christopher
20W–18L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Cade Bogan
0W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Justin Andras
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Cane
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Timothy Kwan
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.