← Teams

WHRC-VanGasse

2022 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Alan Lave
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Michael Rollyson
published 3.5
3.32
Frank Foti
published 3.5
3.31
Greg van Gasse
published 3.5
—
Larry Kaster
published 3.5
—
Tom Stacy
published 3.5
2.89
Mark Becker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Randolph Splitter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results3 ties
2022-05-19Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesMark Becker / Paul Stutzman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-12Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesFrank Foti / Alan Lave vs Bob Bedritis / Jack Schunk6-3, 6-2
2022-05-06Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesAlan Lave / Randolph Splitter vs Mark Stromme / Michael McCarthy6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alan Lave
20W–23L career
10%90%0%
3.62
3.5
Michael Rollyson
4W–8L career
4%86%11%
3.34
3.5
Frank Foti
20W–21L career
3%90%7%
3.32
3.5
Greg van Gasse
8W–22L career
2%94%4%
3.31
3.5
Larry Kaster
20W–21L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tom Stacy
3W–7L career
not enough data
—
3
Mark Becker
15W–33L career · type A
0%93%7%
2.89
3
Randolph Splitter
7W–30L career
7%87%6%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.